Skip header and navigation

2 records – page 1 of 1.

[Was chemotherapy beneficial for the patients with advanced ovarian cancer? A comparison of survival and resource use in two different time periods]

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature22516
Source
Ugeskr Laeger. 1996 Aug 19;158(34):4767-70
Publication Type
Article
Date
Aug-19-1996
Author
K. Bertelsen
A. Kruhøffer
Author Affiliation
Onkologisk afdeling, Odense Universitetahospital.
Source
Ugeskr Laeger. 1996 Aug 19;158(34):4767-70
Date
Aug-19-1996
Language
Danish
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Bed Occupancy
Cisplatin - therapeutic use
Combined Modality Therapy
Comparative Study
Denmark - epidemiology
English Abstract
Female
Humans
Length of Stay
Ovarian Neoplasms - drug therapy - mortality - surgery
Survival Rate
Abstract
Around 1980, aggressive surgery and combination-chemotherapy were introduced as routine therapy in advanced ovarian cancer. It is interesting to evaluate whether this has been associated with an improvement of survival. A comparison between patients diagnosed in the county of Funen during the period April 1973 to April 1978 with patients diagnosed during the period September 1981 to September 1986 was made. In the last period the patients were treated according to the DACOVA guidelines (Damish Cancer of the Ovaries). An improvement in median survival but not in five-year survival was registered. The number of hospital bed-days during the two periods was calculated. In the second period the number of hospital bed-days was seven days higher per patient than in the first period. The cost per gained year of life was 240,000 Dkr. in 1992 prices.
PubMed ID
8801686 View in PubMed
Less detail

What have we achieved in ovarian cancer? A comparison of survivals and resources in two different periods.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature23283
Source
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1995 Mar;5(2):148-155
Publication Type
Article
Date
Mar-1995
Author
K. Bertelsen
A. Kruhøffer
Author Affiliation
Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Source
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1995 Mar;5(2):148-155
Date
Mar-1995
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Abstract
In a geographically well-defined region in Denmark, survival and resource spending for strictly defined epithelial ovarian cancer patients treated during the periods 1973-1978 and 1981-1986 were compared. Almost all epithelial ovarian cancer patients diagnosed during the periods involved were identified; in both periods 206 patients were found. The number of patients was cross-checked with the Danish Cancer Registry. Treatment strategy was totally different in the two periods. In the first period debulking surgery was not routine and postoperative treatment consisted of pelvic irradiation and alkylating agents. In the second period the patients were treated according to national protocols prescribing debulking surgery, second-look laparotomy, and allocation to randomized trials. Advanced ovarian cancer patients were treated with combination chemotherapy with cisplatinum. Median survival was superior for the period 1981-1986, but long-term survival was similar in the two periods, 5-year survival being 27.5% for the period 1973-1978 and 26.9% for the period 1981-1986. The resources spent on ovarian cancer patients were calculated for the two periods, expressed as 'bed-days' spent on ovarian cancer. An estimate of the price of the extra resources used was made; in the second period $1.18 million $US more were spent on ovarian cancer. The costs were correlated with survival and the cost per gained year of life was estimated as $36 493. In conclusion, the study shows that for all stages of ovarian cancer an improvement of median survival was found, but not of long-term survival. The survival gain was associated with extra resource spending.
PubMed ID
11578470 View in PubMed
Less detail