Skip header and navigation

1 records – page 1 of 1.

A multicenter study of the need of additional freezing for cryoballoon ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: The AD-Balloon study.
J Arrhythm. 2017 Apr;33(2):81-85
Publication Type
Koji Miyamoto
Atsushi Doi
Naoki Amaya
Yoshiaki Morita
Takashi Noda
Masanori Asakura
Toshimitsu Hamasaki
Hiroshi Tada
Masahiko Takagi
Satoshi Yasuda
Kengo Kusano
J Arrhythm. 2017 Apr;33(2):81-85
Publication Type
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a cornerstone of catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), and balloon-based ablation has been recently performed worldwide. Ablation using the second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) (Arctic Front Advance(TM), Medtronic, MN, USA) is useful for PVI; however, there is some debate concerning the optimal freezing time and number of cycles after PVI is achieved.
The AD-Balloon study was designed as a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial to evaluate the optimal strategy (freezing cycles) of CB2 ablation (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000020130). The main objective of this study is to investigate the need for an additional freezing cycle after PVI in patients treated with CB2 ablation. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with additional freezing (AD group) or without additional freezing (non-AD group). In the AD group, 3 min of additional freezing time will be applied in all pulmonary veins after PVI is confirmed at the previous freezing cycle. In the non-AD group, no additional freezing will be applied in all pulmonary veins after PVI is confirmed. The primary endpoint of this study is the occurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias within a 1-year follow-up period. We will enroll 110 consecutive patients with PAF. We will also investigate the usefulness of delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging to assess the ablation lesions caused by CB2 ablation.
The results of this study are currently under investigation.
The AD-Balloon study would assess the need for an additional freezing cycle after PVI is achieved. Our findings may contribute to further improvement of the CB2 ablation procedure.
Cites: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 May;26(5):493-50025644659
Cites: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 2;64(21):e1-7624685669
Cites: Europace. 2015 Mar;17(3):379-8725376699
Cites: Circulation. 1997 Feb 4;95(3):572-69024141
Cites: Cryobiology. 2009 Dec;59(3):229-4319833119
Cites: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Aug;6(4):769-7523748208
Cites: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Mar;14 (3):281-612716111
Cites: Heart Rhythm. 2014 Mar;11(3):369-7424252287
Cites: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Jun;24(6):692-823489648
Cites: Cancer. 1965 Dec;18(12):1646-515845803
Cites: N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 3;339(10):659-669725923
Cites: J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Mar;39(2):145-5124317917
Cites: Heart Rhythm. 2015 Feb;12(2):268-7425446159
Cites: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Aug;23 (8):874-622494116
Cites: Heart Rhythm. 2015 Apr;12(4):673-8025542427
Cites: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Apr;7(2):288-9224610797
Cites: Eur Heart J. 2007 Sep;28(18):2231-717569680
Cites: Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jul;12(7):1658-6625778428
Cites: Am J Cardiol. 2014 May 1;113(9):1509-1324630388
PubMed ID
28416971 View in PubMed
Less detail