Skip header and navigation

Refine By

   MORE

9 records – page 1 of 1.

The 2005 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part 1- blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature173955
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2005 Jun;21(8):645-56
Publication Type
Article
Date
Jun-2005
Author
Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Finlay A McAllister
Martin G Myers
Donald W McKay
Peter Bolli
Carl Abbott
Ernesto L Schiffrin
Steven Grover
George Honos
Marcel Lebel
Karen Mann
Thomas Wilson
Brian Penner
Guy Tremblay
Sheldon W Tobe
Ross D Feldman
Author Affiliation
Division of Nephrology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2005 Jun;21(8):645-56
Date
Jun-2005
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory
Canada
Decision Trees
Evidence-Based Medicine
Humans
Hypertension - diagnosis - prevention & control
Patient Education as Topic
Risk assessment
Abstract
To provide updated, evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and assessment of adults with high blood pressure (BP).
For persons in whom a high BP value is recorded, the assignment of a diagnosis of hypertension is dependent on the appropriate measurement of BP, the level of the BP elevation and the duration of follow-up. In addition, the presence of cardiovascular risk factors and target organ damage should be assessed to determine the urgency, intensity and type of treatment. For persons diagnosed as having hypertension, estimating overall risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes requires an assessment of other vascular risk factors and hypertensive target organ damage.
MEDLINE searches were conducted from November 2003 to October 2004 to update the 2004 recommendations. Reference lists were scanned, experts were polled, and the personal files of the authors and subgroup members were used to identify other studies. Identified articles were reviewed and appraised using prespecified levels of evidence by content and methodological experts. As per previous years, only studies that had been published in the peer-reviewed literature were included; evidence from abstracts, conference presentations and unpublished personal communications was not included.
This document contains recommendations for BP measurement, diagnosis of hypertension and assessment of cardiovascular risk for adults with high BP. These include the accurate measurement of BP, criteria for diagnosis of hypertension, and recommendations for follow-up, assessment of overall cardiovascular risk, routine and optional laboratory testing, assessment for renovascular and endocrine causes, home and ambulatory BP monitoring, and the role of echocardiography for those with hypertension. Key features of the 2005 recommendations include an expedited diagnostic algorithm for hypertension and an endorsement of the use of home/self and ambulatory BP assessment as validated techniques in establishing the diagnosis of hypertension.
All recommendations were graded according to the strength of the evidence and voted on by the 43 members of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program Evidence-Based Recommendations Task Force. All recommendations reported in the present paper received at least 95% consensus. These guidelines will continue to be updated annually.
PubMed ID
16003448 View in PubMed
Less detail

The 2006 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part I--Blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature168977
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;22(7):573-81
Publication Type
Article
Date
May-15-2006
Author
B R Hemmelgarn
Finlay A McAlister
Steven Grover
Martin G Myers
Donald W McKay
Peter Bolli
Carl Abbott
Ernesto L Schiffrin
George Honos
Ellen Burgess
Karen Mann
Thomas Wilson
Brian Penner
Guy Tremblay
Alain Milot
Arun Chockalingam
Rhian M Touyz
Sheldon W Tobe
Author Affiliation
Division of Nephrology, University of Calgary, and Foothills Hospital, 1403 29th Street Northwest, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. brenda.hemmelgarn@calgaryhealthregion.ca
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;22(7):573-81
Date
May-15-2006
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Advisory Committees
Blood Pressure Determination
Canada
Echocardiography
Humans
Hyperaldosteronism - diagnosis
Hypertension - diagnosis
Mass Screening
Patient Education as Topic
Pheochromocytoma - diagnosis
Risk assessment
Risk factors
Abstract
To provide updated, evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and assessment of adults with high blood pressure.
For persons in whom a high blood pressure value is recorded, a diagnosis of hypertension is dependent on the appropriate measurement of blood pressure, the level of the blood pressure elevation, the approach used to monitor blood pressure (office, ambulatory or home/self), and the duration of follow-up. In addition, the presence of cardiovascular risk factors and target organ damage should be assessed to determine the urgency, intensity and type of treatment. For persons diagnosed as having hypertension, estimating the overall risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes requires an assessment for other vascular risk factors and hypertensive target organ damage.
MEDLINE searches were conducted from November 2004 to October 2005 to update the 2005 recommendations. Reference lists were scanned, experts were polled, and the personal files of the authors and subgroup members were used to identify other studies. Identified articles were reviewed and appraised using prespecified levels of evidence by content and methodological experts. As per previous years, the authors only included studies that had been published in the peer-reviewed literature and did not include evidence from abstracts, conference presentations or unpublished personal communications.
The present document contains recommendations for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis of hypertension, and assessment of cardiovascular risk for adults with high blood pressure. These include the accurate measurement of blood pressure, criteria for the diagnosis of hypertension and recommendations for follow-up, assessment of overall cardiovascular risk, routine and optional laboratory testing, assessment for renovascular and endocrine causes, home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and the role of echocardiography for those with hypertension. Key features of the 2006 recommendations include continued emphasis on an expedited diagnosis of hypertension, an in-depth review of the role of global risk assessment in hypertension therapy, and the use of home/self blood pressure monitoring for patients with masked hypertension (subjects with hypertension who have a blood pressure that is normal in clinic but elevated on home/self measurement).
All recommendations were graded according to the strength of the evidence and were voted on by the 45 members of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program Evidence-Based Recommendations Task Force. All recommendations reported herein received at least 95% consensus. These guidelines will continue to be updated annually.
Notes
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2002 Jun;18(6):625-4112107420
Cites: CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):480-316129865
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2001 May;17(5):543-5911381277
Cites: JAMA. 2001 Jul 11;286(2):180-711448281
Cites: Am J Hypertens. 2001 Nov;14(11 Pt 1):1099-10511724207
Cites: Clin Sci (Lond). 2001 Dec;101(6):671-911724655
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2001 Dec;17(12):1249-6311773936
Cites: Am Heart J. 2000 Feb;139(2 Pt 1):272-8110650300
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2000 Sep;16(9):1094-10211021953
Cites: BMJ. 2001 Apr 21;322(7292):977-8011312234
Cites: J Hypertens. 2002 Apr;20(4):579-8111910284
Cites: Stroke. 2002 Jul;33(7):1776-8112105351
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2002 Jun;18(6):604-2412107419
Cites: Eur Heart J. 2003 Jun;24(11):987-100312788299
Cites: Lancet. 2003 Nov 29;362(9398):1776-714654312
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2004 Jan;20(1):31-4014968141
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2004 Jan;20(1):41-5414968142
Cites: JAMA. 2004 Mar 17;291(11):1342-915026401
Cites: Intern Med J. 2004 May;34(5):290-115151677
Cites: Lancet. 2004 Sep 11-17;364(9438):937-5215364185
Cites: J Hum Hypertens. 2004 Nov;18(11):769-7315141270
Cites: Circulation. 1991 Jan;83(1):356-621984895
Cites: JAMA. 1996 May 22-29;275(20):1571-68622248
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jul 8;156(13):1414-208678709
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 1998 Mar 23;158(6):655-629521231
Cites: JAMA. 2004 Nov 17;292(19):2350-615547162
Cites: Am J Hypertens. 2005 Jun;18(6):772-815925734
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2005 Jun;21(8):645-5616003448
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2005 Jun;21(8):657-7216003449
Cites: Blood Press Monit. 2002 Dec;7(6):293-30012488648
PubMed ID
16755312 View in PubMed
Less detail

The 2007 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part 1- blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature163301
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2007 May 15;23(7):529-38
Publication Type
Conference/Meeting Material
Article
Date
May-15-2007
Author
Raj S Padwal
Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Finlay A McAlister
Donald W McKay
Steven Grover
Thomas Wilson
Brian Penner
Ellen Burgess
Peter Bolli
Michael Hill
Jeff Mahon
Martin G Myers
Carl Abbott
Ernest L Schiffrin
George Honos
Karen Mann
Guy Tremblay
Alain Milot
Lyne Cloutier
Arun Chockalingam
Nadia A Khan
Simon W Rabkin
Martin Dawes
Rhian M Touyz
Sheldon W Tobe
Author Affiliation
Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. rpadwal@ualberta.ca
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2007 May 15;23(7):529-38
Date
May-15-2007
Language
English
Publication Type
Conference/Meeting Material
Article
Keywords
Blood Pressure Determination
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory
Canada
Health promotion
Humans
Hypertension - diagnosis - physiopathology - prevention & control
Patient Education as Topic
Risk factors
Abstract
To provide updated, evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and assessment of adults with hypertension.
The diagnosis of hypertension is dependent on the appropriate measurement of blood pressure, the timely assessment of serially elevated readings, the degree of blood pressure elevation, the method of measurement (office, ambulatory, home) and any associated comorbidities. The presence of cardiovascular risk factors and target organ damage should be ascertained to assess global cardiovascular risk, and to determine the urgency, intensity and type of treatment required.
MEDLINE searches were conducted from November 2005 to October 2006 with the aid of a medical librarian. Reference lists were scanned, experts were contacted, and the personal files of authors and subgroup members were used to identify additional studies. Content and methodological experts assessed studies using prespecified, standardized evidence-based algorithms. Recommendations were based on evidence from peer-reviewed, full-text articles only.
Recommendations for blood pressure measurement, criteria for hypertension diagnosis and follow-up, assessment of global cardiovascular risk, diagnostic testing, diagnosis of renovascular and endocrine causes of hypertension, home and ambulatory monitoring, and the use of echocardiography in hypertensive individuals are outlined. Key messages in 2007 include continued emphasis on the expedited, accurate diagnosis of hypertension, the importance of assessing the risk of cerebrovascular events as part of global risk assessment, the need for ongoing reassessment of patients with high normal blood pressure, and reviews of recent studies involving laboratory testing and home monitoring.
All recommendations were graded according to strength of the evidence and were voted on by the 57 members of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program Evidence-Based Recommendations Task Force. All recommendations reported here received at least 70% consensus. These guidelines will continue to be updated annually.
Notes
Cites: Lancet. 2001 Nov 17;358(9294):1682-611728544
Cites: Clin Sci (Lond). 2001 Dec;101(6):671-911724655
Cites: J Hypertens. 2002 Apr;20(4):579-8111910284
Cites: Stroke. 2002 Jul;33(7):1776-8112105351
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2002 Jun;18(6):604-2412107419
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2002 Jun;18(6):625-4112107420
Cites: Blood Press Monit. 2002 Dec;7(6):293-30012488648
Cites: Lancet. 2002 Dec 14;360(9349):1903-1312493255
Cites: Eur Heart J. 2003 Jun;24(11):987-100312788299
Cites: Hypertension. 2004 Jan;43(1):10-714638619
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2004 Jan;20(1):31-4014968141
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2004 Jan;20(1):41-5414968142
Cites: JAMA. 2004 Mar 17;291(11):1342-915026401
Cites: Lancet. 2004 Sep 11-17;364(9438):937-5215364185
Cites: Circulation. 1991 Jan;83(1):356-621984895
Cites: JAMA. 1996 May 22-29;275(20):1571-68622248
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jul 8;156(13):1414-208678709
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 1998 Mar 23;158(6):655-629521231
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Dec 1;160(11):1122-3115561992
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2005 Jun;21(8):645-5616003448
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2005 Jun;21(8):657-7216003449
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jul 11;165(13):1541-616009871
Cites: Kidney Int. 2006 Jan;69(2):406-1116408134
Cites: J Hypertens. 2006 Apr;24(4):775-8116531808
Cites: N Engl J Med. 2006 Apr 20;354(16):1685-9716537662
Cites: Hypertension. 2006 May;47(5):846-5316567588
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;22(7):559-6416755310
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;22(7):573-8116755312
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;22(7):583-9316755313
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;22(7):606-1316755316
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Oct 15;164(8):725-716936069
Cites: Lancet. 2003 Nov 29;362(9398):1776-714654312
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2001 Dec;17(12):1249-6311773936
Cites: Am Heart J. 2000 Feb;139(2 Pt 1):272-8110650300
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 2000 Mar 13;160(5):685-9310724055
Cites: Clin Radiol. 2000 May;55(5):346-5310816399
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2000 Sep;16(9):1094-10211021953
Cites: BMJ. 2001 Apr 21;322(7292):977-8011312234
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2001 May;17(5):543-5911381277
Cites: JAMA. 2001 Jul 11;286(2):180-711448281
Cites: N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 1;345(18):1291-711794147
Comment In: Can J Cardiol. 2007 May 15;23(7):603-417593584
PubMed ID
17534459 View in PubMed
Less detail

The 2008 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part 1 - blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature156767
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2008 Jun;24(6):455-63
Publication Type
Article
Date
Jun-2008
Author
Raj S Padwal
Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Nadia A Khan
Steven Grover
Finlay A McAlister
Donald W McKay
Thomas Wilson
Brian Penner
Ellen Burgess
Peter Bolli
Michael D Hill
Jeff Mahon
Martin G Myers
Carl Abbott
Ernesto L Schiffrin
George Honos
Karen Mann
Guy Tremblay
Alain Milot
Lyne Cloutier
Arun Chockalingam
Simon W Rabkin
Martin Dawes Dawes
Rhian M Touyz
Chaim Bell
Kevin D Burns
Marcel Ruzicka
Norman R C Campbell
Marcel Lebel
Sheldon W Tobe
Author Affiliation
Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. rpadwal@ualberta.ca
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2008 Jun;24(6):455-63
Date
Jun-2008
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use
Blood Pressure - physiology
Blood Pressure Determination - standards
Canada
Clinical Competence
Diagnosis, Differential
Education, Medical, Continuing - standards
Humans
Hypertension - diagnosis - drug therapy - physiopathology
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Program Evaluation - trends
Risk Assessment - methods
Abstract
To provide updated, evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and assessment of adults with hypertension.
The diagnosis of hypertension is dependent on appropriate blood pressure measurement, the timely assessment of serially elevated readings, degree of blood pressure elevation, method of measurement (office, ambulatory, home) and associated comorbidities. The presence of cardiovascular risk factors and target organ damage should be ascertained to assess global cardiovascular risk and determine the urgency, intensity and type of treatment required.
MEDLINE searches were conducted from November 2006 to October 2007 with the aid of a medical librarian. Reference lists were scanned, experts were contacted, and the personal files of authors and subgroup members were used to identify additional studies. Content and methodological experts assessed studies using prespecified, standardized evidence-based algorithms. Recommendations were based on evidence from peer-reviewed, full-text articles only.
Recommendations for blood pressure measurement, criteria for hypertension diagnosis and follow-up, assessment of global cardiovascular risk, diagnostic testing, diagnosis of renovascular and endocrine causes of hypertension, home and ambulatory monitoring, and the use of echocardiography in hypertensive individuals are outlined. Key messages in 2008 include continued emphasis on the expedited, accurate diagnosis of hypertension, the importance of global risk assessment and the need for ongoing monitoring of hypertensive patients to identify incident type 2 diabetes.
All recommendations were graded according to strength of the evidence and voted on by the 57 members of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program Evidence-Based Recommendations Task Force. All recommendations reported here received at least 70% consensus. These guidelines will continue to be updated annually.
Notes
Cites: Am Heart J. 2000 Feb;139(2 Pt 1):272-8110650300
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 2007 Nov 26;167(21):2296-30318039987
Cites: Clin Radiol. 2000 May;55(5):346-5310816399
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2000 Sep;16(9):1094-10211021953
Cites: JAMA. 2001 Jul 11;286(2):180-711448281
Cites: Clin Sci (Lond). 2001 Dec;101(6):671-911724655
Cites: Stroke. 2002 Jul;33(7):1776-8112105351
Cites: Lancet. 2002 Dec 14;360(9349):1903-1312493255
Cites: Lancet. 2003 Apr 5;361(9364):1149-5812686036
Cites: Eur Heart J. 2003 Jun;24(11):987-100312788299
Cites: Lancet. 2003 Nov 29;362(9398):1776-714654312
Cites: Diabetes Care. 2004 Jan;27(1):247-5514693997
Cites: Hypertension. 2004 Jan;43(1):10-714638619
Cites: Hypertension. 2004 May;43(5):963-915037557
Cites: Lancet. 2004 Sep 11-17;364(9438):937-5215364185
Cites: Circulation. 1991 Jan;83(1):356-621984895
Cites: JAMA. 1996 May 22-29;275(20):1571-68622248
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jul 8;156(13):1414-208678709
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 1998 Mar 23;158(6):655-629521231
Cites: Am J Cardiol. 2005 Jan 1;95(1):29-3515619390
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2005 Jun;21(8):645-5616003448
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;22(7):559-6416755310
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;22(7):573-8116755312
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;22(7):606-1316755316
Cites: Hypertension. 2006 Aug;48(2):219-2416801488
Cites: N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 12;355(15):1551-6216980380
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 2006 Nov 13;166(20):2191-20117101936
Cites: Lancet. 2007 Jan 20;369(9557):201-717240286
Cites: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Mar;188(3):798-81117312071
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2007 May 15;23(7):529-3817534459
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2007 May 15;23(7):539-5017534460
Cites: J Hypertens. 2007 Jun;25(6):1311-717563546
Cites: Kidney Int. 2007 Aug;72(3):260-417507905
Cites: Hypertension. 2007 Sep;50(3):467-7317679652
Cites: N Engl J Med. 2000 Mar 30;342(13):905-1210738048
PubMed ID
18548142 View in PubMed
Less detail

The 2009 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part 1--blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature151165
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2009 May;25(5):279-86
Publication Type
Article
Date
May-2009
Author
Raj S Padwal
Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Nadia A Khan
Steven Grover
Donald W McKay
Thomas Wilson
Brian Penner
Ellen Burgess
Finlay A McAlister
Peter Bolli
Machael D Hill
Jeff Mahon
Martin G Myers
Carl Abbott
Ernesto L Schiffrin
George Honos
Karen Mann
Guy Tremblay
Alain Milot
Lyne Cloutier
Arun Chockalingam
Simon W Rabkin
Martin Dawes
Rhian M Touyz
Chaim Bell
Kevin D Burns
Marcel Ruzicka
Norman R C Campbell
Michel Vallée
Ramesh Prasad
Marcel Lebel
Sheldon W Tobe
Author Affiliation
Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. rpadwal@ualberta.ca
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2009 May;25(5):279-86
Date
May-2009
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Adult
Aged
Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use
Blood Pressure Determination - standards
Canada
Clinical Competence
Combined Modality Therapy
Education, Medical, Continuing - standards
Female
Guideline Adherence
Health Promotion - organization & administration
Humans
Hypertension - diagnosis - therapy
Life Style
Male
Middle Aged
Prognosis
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Risk Management
Treatment Outcome
Abstract
To provide updated, evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and assessment of adults with hypertension.
The diagnosis of hypertension is dependent on appropriate blood pressure measurement, the timely assessment of serially elevated readings, the degree of blood pressure elevation, the method of measurement (office, ambulatory, home) and associated comorbidities. The presence of cardiovascular risk factors and target organ damage should be ascertained to assess global cardiovascular risk and determine the urgency, intensity and type of treatment required.
MEDLINE searches were conducted from November 2007 to October 2008 with the aid of a medical librarian. Reference lists were scanned, experts were contacted, and the personal files of authors and subgroup members were used to identify additional studies. Content and methodological experts assessed studies using prespecified, standardized evidence-based algorithms. Recommendations were based on evidence from peer-reviewed full-text articles only.
Recommendations for blood pressure measurement, criteria for hypertension diagnosis and follow-up, assessment of global cardiovascular risk, diagnostic testing, diagnosis of renovascular and endocrine causes of hypertension, home and ambulatory monitoring, and the use of echocardiography in hypertensive individuals are outlined. Key messages include continued emphasis on the expedited, accurate diagnosis of hypertension, the importance of global risk assessment and the need for ongoing monitoring of hypertensive patients to identify incident type 2 diabetes.
All recommendations were graded according to strength of the evidence and voted on by the 57 members of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program Evidence-Based Recommendations Task Force. All recommendations were required to be supported by at least 70% of task force members. These guidelines will continue to be updated annually.
Notes
Cites: Diabetes Care. 2004 Jan;27(1):247-5514693997
Cites: JAMA. 2008 Jul 9;300(2):197-20818612117
Cites: Hypertension. 2004 May;43(5):963-915037557
Cites: Pediatrics. 2004 Aug;114(2 Suppl 4th Report):555-7615286277
Cites: Lancet. 2004 Sep 11-17;364(9438):937-5215364185
Cites: Circulation. 1991 Jan;83(1):356-621984895
Cites: JAMA. 1996 May 22-29;275(20):1571-68622248
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jul 8;156(13):1414-208678709
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 1998 Mar 23;158(6):655-629521231
Cites: Am J Cardiol. 2005 Jan 1;95(1):29-3515619390
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2005 Jun;21(8):645-5616003448
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;22(7):559-6416755310
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;22(7):573-8116755312
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;22(7):606-1316755316
Cites: N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 12;355(15):1551-6216980380
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 2006 Nov 13;166(20):2191-20117101936
Cites: Lancet. 2007 Jan 20;369(9557):201-717240286
Cites: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Mar;188(3):798-81117312071
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2007 May 15;23(7):529-3817534459
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2007 May 15;23(7):539-5017534460
Cites: J Hypertens. 2007 Jun;25(6):1311-717563546
Cites: Kidney Int. 2007 Aug;72(3):260-417507905
Cites: Hypertension. 2007 Sep;50(3):467-7317679652
Cites: Am Heart J. 2000 Feb;139(2 Pt 1):272-8110650300
Cites: N Engl J Med. 2000 Mar 30;342(13):905-1210738048
Cites: Clin Radiol. 2000 May;55(5):346-5310816399
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2000 Sep;16(9):1094-10211021953
Cites: JAMA. 2001 Jul 11;286(2):180-711448281
Cites: Clin Sci (Lond). 2001 Dec;101(6):671-911724655
Cites: Stroke. 2002 Jul;33(7):1776-8112105351
Cites: Lancet. 2002 Dec 14;360(9349):1903-1312493255
Cites: Lancet. 2003 Apr 5;361(9364):1149-5812686036
Cites: Eur Heart J. 2003 Jun;24(11):987-100312788299
Cites: Lancet. 2003 Nov 29;362(9398):1776-714654312
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 2007 Nov 26;167(21):2296-30318039987
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2008 Jun;24(6):455-6318548142
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2008 Jun;24(6):465-7518548143
Cites: Hypertension. 2004 Jan;43(1):10-714638619
PubMed ID
19417858 View in PubMed
Less detail

The 2010 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part I - blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature143445
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2010 May;26(5):241-8
Publication Type
Article
Date
May-2010
Author
Robert R Quinn
Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Raj S Padwal
Martin G Myers
Lyne Cloutier
Peter Bolli
Donald W McKay
Nadia A Khan
Michael D Hill
Jeff Mahon
Daniel G Hackam
Steven Grover
Thomas Wilson
Brian Penner
Ellen Burgess
Finlay A McAlister
Maxime Lamarre-Cliche
Donna McLean
Ernesto L Schiffrin
George Honos
Karen Mann
Guy Tremblay
Alain Milot
Arun Chockalingam
Simon W Rabkin
Martin Dawes
Rhian M Touyz
Kevin D Burns
Marcel Ruzicka
Norman R C Campbell
Michel Vallée
G V Ramesh Prasad
Marcel Lebel
Sheldon W Tobe
Author Affiliation
Division of Nephrology, University of Calgary, Alberta. rob.quinn@albertahealthservices.ca
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2010 May;26(5):241-8
Date
May-2010
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Adult
Aged
Blood Pressure Determination - standards
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory - standards
Canada
Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology - prevention & control
Female
Humans
Hypertension - diagnosis - epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Physician's Practice Patterns
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Quality of Health Care
Risk assessment
Abstract
To provide updated, evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and assessment of adults with hypertension.
MEDLINE searches were conducted from November 2008 to October 2009 with the aid of a medical librarian. Reference lists were scanned, experts were contacted, and the personal files of authors and subgroup members were used to identify additional studies. Content and methodological experts assessed studies using prespecified, standardized evidence-based algorithms. Recommendations were based on evidence from peer-reviewed full-text articles only.
Recommendations for blood pressure measurement, criteria for hypertension diagnosis and follow-up, assessment of global cardiovascular risk, diagnostic testing, diagnosis of renovascular and endocrine causes of hypertension, home and ambulatory monitoring, and the use of echocardiography in hypertensive individuals are outlined. Changes to the recommendations for 2010 relate to automated office blood pressure measurements. Automated office blood pressure measurements can be used in the assessment of office blood pressure. When used under proper conditions, an automated office systolic blood pressure of 135 mmHg or higher or diastolic blood pressure of 85 mmHg or higher should be considered analogous to a mean awake ambulatory systolic blood pressure of 135 mmHg or higher and diastolic blood pressure of 85 mmHg or higher, respectively.
All recommendations were graded according to strength of the evidence and voted on by the 63 members of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program Evidence-Based Recommendations Task Force. To be approved, all recommendations were required to be supported by at least 70% of task force members. These guidelines will continue to be updated annually.
Notes
Cites: Pediatrics. 2004 Aug;114(2 Suppl 4th Report):555-7615286277
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2007 May 15;23(7):529-3817534459
Cites: Circulation. 1991 Jan;83(1):356-621984895
Cites: JAMA. 1996 May 22-29;275(20):1571-68622248
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jul 8;156(13):1414-208678709
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 1998 Mar 23;158(6):655-629521231
Cites: BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005;5(1):1815985180
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2005 Jun;21(8):645-5616003448
Cites: Blood Press Monit. 2005 Oct;10(5):257-6216205444
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2007 May 15;23(7):539-5017534460
Cites: J Hum Hypertens. 2007 Jul;21(7):588-9017377600
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 2007 Nov 26;167(21):2296-30318039987
Cites: Am J Hypertens. 2008 Mar;21(3):280-318219304
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2008 Jun;24(6):455-6318548142
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2008 Jun;24(6):465-7518548143
Cites: JAMA. 2008 Jul 9;300(2):197-20818612117
Cites: Blood Press Monit. 2008 Oct;13(5):299-30318799957
Cites: Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;62(10):1484-9818691228
Cites: J Hypertens. 2009 Feb;27(2):280-619155785
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2009 May;25(5):279-8619417858
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2009 May;25(5):287-9819417859
Cites: Blood Press Monit. 2009 Jun;14(3):108-1119417634
Cites: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 29;54(14):1209-2719778661
Cites: Am Heart J. 2000 Feb;139(2 Pt 1):272-8110650300
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2000 Sep;16(9):1094-10211021953
Cites: Blood Press Monit. 2001 Apr;6(2):107-1011433132
Cites: JAMA. 2001 Jul 11;286(2):180-711448281
Cites: Blood Press Monit. 2001 Jun;6(3):161-511518840
Cites: Lancet. 2002 Dec 14;360(9349):1903-1312493255
Cites: Eur Heart J. 2003 Jun;24(11):987-100312788299
Cites: Lancet. 2003 Nov 29;362(9398):1776-714654312
Cites: Hypertension. 2004 Jan;43(1):10-714638619
Cites: Blood Press Monit. 2006 Apr;11(2):59-6216534406
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;22(7):559-6416755310
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;22(7):573-8116755312
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2006 May 15;22(7):606-1316755316
Cites: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2007 Apr;9(4):267-7017396069
Cites: Lancet. 2004 Sep 11-17;364(9438):937-5215364185
PubMed ID
20485688 View in PubMed
Less detail

The 2011 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, and therapy.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature132607
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2011 Jul-Aug;27(4):415-433.e1-2
Publication Type
Article
Author
Doreen M Rabi
Stella S Daskalopoulou
Raj S Padwal
Nadia A Khan
Steven A Grover
Daniel G Hackam
Martin G Myers
Donald W McKay
Robert R Quinn
Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Lyne Cloutier
Peter Bolli
Michael D Hill
Thomas Wilson
Brian Penner
Ellen Burgess
Maxime Lamarre-Cliché
Donna McLean
Ernesto L Schiffrin
George Honos
Karen Mann
Guy Tremblay
Alain Milot
Arun Chockalingam
Simon W Rabkin
Martin Dawes
Rhian M Touyz
Kevin D Burns
Marcel Ruzicka
Norman R C Campbell
Michel Vallée
G V Ramesh Prasad
Marcel Lebel
Tavis S Campbell
M Patrice Lindsay
Robert J Herman
Pierre Larochelle
Ross D Feldman
J Malcolm O Arnold
Gordon W Moe
Jonathan G Howlett
Luc Trudeau
Simon L Bacon
Robert J Petrella
Richard Lewanczuk
James A Stone
Denis Drouin
Jean-Martin Boulanger
Mukul Sharma
Pavel Hamet
George Fodor
George K Dresser
S George Carruthers
George Pylypchuk
Richard E Gilbert
Lawrence A Leiter
Charlotte Jones
Richard I Ogilvie
Vincent Woo
Philip A McFarlane
Robert A Hegele
Luc Poirier
Sheldon W Tobe
Author Affiliation
Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. doreen.rabi@albertahealthservices.ca
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2011 Jul-Aug;27(4):415-433.e1-2
Language
English
French
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Adult
Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use
Blood Pressure Determination
Canada
Health education
Humans
Hypertension - diagnosis - drug therapy
Risk assessment
Abstract
We updated the evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, assessment, prevention, and treatment of hypertension in adults for 2011. The major guideline changes this year are: (1) a recommendation was made for using comparative risk analogies when communicating a patient's cardiovascular risk; (2) diagnostic testing issues for renal artery stenosis were discussed; (3) recommendations were added for the management of hypertension during the acute phase of stroke; (4) people with hypertension and diabetes are now considered high risk for cardiovascular events if they have elevated urinary albumin excretion, overt kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, or the presence of other cardiovascular risk factors; (5) the combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB) is preferred over the combination of an ACE inhibitor and a thiazide diuretic in persons with diabetes and hypertension; and (6) a recommendation was made to coordinate with pharmacists to improve antihypertensive medication adherence. We also discussed the recent analyses that examined the association between angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and cancer.
PubMed ID
21801975 View in PubMed
Less detail

The 2012 Canadian hypertension education program recommendations for the management of hypertension: blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, and therapy.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature124290
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2012 May;28(3):270-87
Publication Type
Article
Date
May-2012
Author
Stella S Daskalopoulou
Nadia A Khan
Robert R Quinn
Marcel Ruzicka
Donald W McKay
Daniel G Hackam
Simon W Rabkin
Doreen M Rabi
Richard E Gilbert
Raj S Padwal
Martin Dawes
Rhian M Touyz
Tavis S Campbell
Lyne Cloutier
Steven Grover
George Honos
Robert J Herman
Ernesto L Schiffrin
Peter Bolli
Thomas Wilson
Ross D Feldman
M Patrice Lindsay
Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Michael D Hill
Mark Gelfer
Kevin D Burns
Michel Vallée
G V Ramesh Prasad
Marcel Lebel
Donna McLean
J Malcolm O Arnold
Gordon W Moe
Jonathan G Howlett
Jean-Martin Boulanger
Pierre Larochelle
Lawrence A Leiter
Charlotte Jones
Richard I Ogilvie
Vincent Woo
Janusz Kaczorowski
Luc Trudeau
Simon L Bacon
Robert J Petrella
Alain Milot
James A Stone
Denis Drouin
Maxime Lamarre-Cliché
Marshall Godwin
Guy Tremblay
Pavel Hamet
George Fodor
S George Carruthers
George Pylypchuk
Ellen Burgess
Richard Lewanczuk
George K Dresser
Brian Penner
Robert A Hegele
Philip A McFarlane
Mukul Sharma
Norman R C Campbell
Debra Reid
Luc Poirier
Sheldon W Tobe
Author Affiliation
Division of General Internal Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada. stella.daskalopoulou@mcgill.ca
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2012 May;28(3):270-87
Date
May-2012
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Adult
Aged
Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use
Blood Pressure Determination - methods
Canada
Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology - prevention & control
Education, Medical, Continuing - standards
Evidence-Based Medicine - standards
Female
Health Education - standards
Humans
Hypertension - complications - diagnosis - therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Physiologic - methods
Practice Guidelines as Topic - standards
Prognosis
Risk assessment
Treatment Outcome
Abstract
We updated the evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, assessment, prevention, and treatment of hypertension in adults for 2012. The new recommendations are: (1) use of home blood pressure monitoring to confirm a diagnosis of white coat syndrome; (2) mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists may be used in selected patients with hypertension and systolic heart failure; (3) a history of atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertension should not be a factor in deciding to prescribe an angiotensin-receptor blocker for the treatment of hypertension; and (4) the blood pressure target for patients with nondiabetic chronic kidney disease has now been changed to
PubMed ID
22595447 View in PubMed
Less detail

Research of a Holiday kind: elevators or stairs?

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature128910
Source
CMAJ. 2011 Dec 13;183(18):E1353-5
Publication Type
Article
Date
Dec-13-2011
Author
Sachin Shah
Michael O'Byrne
Merne Wilson
Thomas Wilson
Author Affiliation
Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Sask.
Source
CMAJ. 2011 Dec 13;183(18):E1353-5
Date
Dec-13-2011
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Adult
Aged
Elevators and Escalators
Exercise - psychology
Fatigue - epidemiology - etiology - physiopathology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Health Promotion - methods
Hospitals
Humans
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Motivation
Saskatchewan - epidemiology
Abstract
Staff in hospitals frequently travel between floors and choose between taking the stairs or elevator. We compared the time savings with these two options.
Four people aged 26-67 years completed 14 trips ranging from one to six floors, both ascending and descending. We compared the amount of time per floor travelled by stairs and by two banks of elevators. Participants reported their fatigue levels using a modified Borg scale. We performed two-way analysis of variance to compare the log-transformed data, with participant and time of day as independent variables.
The mean time taken to travel between each floor was 13.1 (standard deviation [SD] 1.7) seconds by stairs and 37.5 (SD 19.0) and 35.6 (SD 23.1) seconds by the two elevators (F=8.61, p
Notes
Cites: Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Oct;17(5):569-7520299999
Cites: J Hosp Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;5(6):323-820803669
PubMed ID
22159365 View in PubMed
Less detail

9 records – page 1 of 1.