Skip header and navigation

Refine By

32 records – page 1 of 4.

Ambulatory surveillance of patients referred for cardiac rehabilitation following cardiac hospitalization: a feasibility study.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature125434
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2012 Jul-Aug;28(4):497-501
Publication Type
Article
Author
David A Alter
Juda Habot
Sherry L Grace
Terry Fair
David Kiernan
Wendy Clark
David Fell
Author Affiliation
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. david.alter@ices.on.ca
Source
Can J Cardiol. 2012 Jul-Aug;28(4):497-501
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Acute Coronary Syndrome - mortality - rehabilitation
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ambulatory Care
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - mortality - rehabilitation
Coronary Artery Bypass - mortality - rehabilitation
Feasibility Studies
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - mortality - rehabilitation
Hospitalization
Hospitals, Community
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction - mortality - rehabilitation
Ontario
Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data
Population Surveillance - methods
Referral and Consultation
Survival Analysis
Waiting Lists
Abstract
Our purpose was to examine the feasibility of implementing an ambulatory surveillance system for monitoring patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation following cardiac hospitalizations.
This study consists of 1208 consecutive referrals to cardiac rehabilitation between October 2007 and April 2008. Patient attendance at cardiac rehabilitation, waiting times for cardiac rehabilitation, and adverse events while waiting for cardiac rehabilitation were tracked by telephone surveillance by a nurse.
Among the 1208 consecutive patients referred, only 44.7% attended cardiac rehabilitation; 36.4% of referred patients were known not to have attended any cardiac rehabilitation, while an additional 18.9% of referred patients were lost to follow-up. Among the 456 referred patients who attended the cardiac rehabilitation program, 19 (4.2%) experienced an adverse event while in the queue (13 of which were for cardiovascular hospitalizations with no deaths), with mean waiting times of 20 days and 24 days among those without and with adverse events, respectively. Among the 440 referred patients who were known not to have attended any cardiac rehabilitation program, 114 (25.9%) had adverse clinical events while in the queue; 46 of these events required cardiac hospitalization and 8 patients died.
Ambulatory surveillance for cardiac rehabilitation referrals is feasible. The high adverse event rates in the queue, particularly among patients who are referred but who do not attend cardiac rehabilitation programs, underscores the importance of ambulatory referral surveillance systems for cardiac rehabilitation following cardiac hospitalizations.
PubMed ID
22480901 View in PubMed
Less detail

Automatic referral to cardiac rehabilitation.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature179514
Source
Med Care. 2004 Jul;42(7):661-9
Publication Type
Article
Date
Jul-2004
Author
Sherry L Grace
Alexandra Evindar
Tabitha N Kung
Patricia E Scholey
Donna E Stewart
Author Affiliation
University Health Network Women's Health Program, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. sherry.grace@uhn.on.ca
Source
Med Care. 2004 Jul;42(7):661-9
Date
Jul-2004
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Aged
Arteriosclerosis - rehabilitation
Causality
Cross-Sectional Studies
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Psychological
Ontario
Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology
Referral and Consultation
Socioeconomic Factors
Abstract
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) remains underused and inconsistently accessed, particularly for women and minorities. This study examined the factors associated with CR enrollment within the context of an automatic referral system through a retrospective chart review plus survey. Through the Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization, it was postulated that enabling and perceived need factors, but not predisposing factors, would significantly predict patient enrollment.
A random sample of all atherosclerotic heart disease (AHD) patients treated at a tertiary care center (Trillium Health Centre, Ontario, Canada) from April 2001 to May 2002 (n = 501) were mailed a survey using a modified Dillman method (71% response rate).
Predisposing measures consisted of sociodemographics such as age, sex, ethnocultural background, work status, level of education, and income. Enabling factors consisted of barriers and facilitators to CR attendance, exercise benefits and barriers (EBBS), and social support (MOS). Perceived need factors consisted of illness perceptions (IPQ) and body mass index.
Of the 272 participants, 199 (73.2%) attended a CR assessment. Lower denial/minimization, fewer logistical barriers to CR (eg, distance, cost), and lower perceptions of AHD as cyclical or episodic reliably predicted CR enrollment among cardiac patients who were automatically referred.
Because none of the predisposing factors were significant in the final model, this suggests that factors associated with CR enrollment within the context of an automatic referral model relate to enabling factors and perceived need. A prospective controlled evaluation of automatic referral is warranted.
PubMed ID
15213491 View in PubMed
Less detail

Cardiac rehabilitation barriers by rurality and socioeconomic status: a cross-sectional study.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature107685
Source
Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:72
Publication Type
Article
Date
2013
Author
Shamila Shanmugasegaram
Paul Oh
Robert D Reid
Treva McCumber
Sherry L Grace
Author Affiliation
York University and University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. sgrace@yorku.ca.
Source
Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:72
Date
2013
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Adult
Aged
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Health Services Accessibility - standards - statistics & numerical data
Heart Diseases - rehabilitation
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Ontario
Rural Population - statistics & numerical data
Socioeconomic Factors
Abstract
Despite greater need, rural inhabitants and individuals of low socioeconomic status (SES) are less likely to undertake cardiac rehabilitation (CR). This study examined barriers to enrollment and participation in CR among these under-represented groups.
Cardiac inpatients from 11 hospitals across Ontario were approached to participate in a larger study. Rurality was assessed by asking participants whether they lived within a 30-minute drive-time from the nearest hospital, with those >30 minutes considered "rural." Participants completed a sociodemographic survey, which included the MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status. One year later, they were mailed a survey which assessed CR utilization and included the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale. In this cross-sectional study, CR utilization and barriers were compared by rurality and SES.
Of the 1809 (80.4%) retained, there were 215 (11.9%) rural participants, and the mean subjective SES was 6.37 ± 1.76. The mean CRBS score was 2.03 ± 0.73. Rural inhabitants reported attending significantly fewer CR sessions (p
Notes
Cites: J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4 Suppl):S1-221659807
Cites: Ital Heart J. 2003 Aug;4(8):551-814564982
Cites: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(7):CD00180021735386
Cites: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):203-1021705915
Cites: Am Heart J. 2011 Oct;162(4):571-584.e221982647
Cites: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2012 Jan-Feb;32(1):41-722193933
Cites: Clin Rehabil. 2012 Feb;26(2):152-6421937522
Cites: Scand J Public Health. 2012 May;40(3):286-9322637368
Cites: JAMA. 2004 Mar 3;291(9):1100-714996779
Cites: Ann Epidemiol. 2004 Feb;14(2):143-5015018888
Cites: Health Technol Assess. 2004 Oct;8(41):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-15215461879
Cites: Med Care. 1976 Jul;14(7):616-24940405
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 1992 May;152(5):1033-51580707
Cites: BMJ. 1997 Feb 22;314(7080):547-529055712
Cites: J Adv Nurs. 2005 Mar;49(5):538-5515713186
Cites: J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2005 Mar-Apr;25(2):80-415818195
Cites: Public Health. 2005 Nov;119(11):1016-2216085152
Cites: J Rural Health. 2006 Spring;22(2):140-616606425
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 2007 May 28;167(10):1019-2517533204
Cites: Circulation. 2007 Oct 9;116(15):1653-6217893274
Cites: Med J Aust. 2008 Jun 16;188(12):712-418558894
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2009 Apr;25(4):e96-919340365
Cites: Pediatrics. 2009 May;123(5):e815-919403474
Cites: Heart. 2009 Dec;95(23):1897-90019815940
Cites: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(7):CD00713120614453
Cites: Int J Health Geogr. 2010;9:2720525345
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 2011 Feb 14;171(3):235-4121325114
Cites: Circulation. 2000 Apr 25;101(16):1913-810779456
Cites: Rehabil Nurs. 2001 Jul-Aug;26(4):141-712035581
Cites: J Rural Health. 2002 Summer;18(3):382-312186311
Cites: Rehabil Nurs. 2003 Mar-Apr;28(2):57-6312673978
Cites: J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4 Suppl):S5-1421659814
PubMed ID
23985017 View in PubMed
Less detail

Cardiologists' charting varied by risk factor, and was often discordant with patient report.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature157753
Source
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;61(10):1073-9
Publication Type
Article
Date
Oct-2008
Author
Shannon Gravely-Witte
Donna E Stewart
Neville Suskin
Lyall Higginson
David A Alter
Sherry L Grace
Author Affiliation
University Health Network Women's Health Program, 200 Elizabeth St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada. sgravely@yorku.ca
Source
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;61(10):1073-9
Date
Oct-2008
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Aged
Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology - etiology
Clinical Competence
Diabetes Mellitus - epidemiology
Dyslipidemias - complications - epidemiology
Epidemiologic Methods
Female
Humans
Hypertension - complications - epidemiology
Male
Medical Records - standards
Middle Aged
Ontario - epidemiology
Outpatient Clinics, Hospital
Self Disclosure
Smoking - adverse effects - epidemiology
Socioeconomic Factors
Abstract
To assess the completeness of cardiac risk factor documentation by cardiologists, and agreement with patient report.
A total of 68 Ontario cardiologists and 789 of their ambulatory cardiology patients were randomly selected. Cardiac risk factor data were systematically extracted from medical charts, and a survey was mailed to participants to assess risk factor concordance.
With regard to completeness of risk factor documentation, 90.4% of charts contained a report of hypertension, 87.2% of diabetes, 80.5% of dyslipidemia, 78.6% of smoking behavior, 73.0% of other comorbidities, 48.7% of family history of heart disease, and 45.9% of body mass index or obesity. Using Cohen's k, there was a concordance of 87.7% between physician charts and patient self-report of diabetes, 69.5% for obesity, 56.8% for smoking status, 49% for hypertension, and 48.4% for family history.
Two of four major cardiac risk factors (hypertension and diabetes) were recorded in 90% of patient records; however, arguably the most important reversible risk factors for cardiac disease (dyslipidemia and smoking) were only reported 80% of the time. The results suggest that physician chart report may not be the criterion standard for quality assessment in cardiac risk factor reporting.
Notes
Cites: J Behav Health Serv Res. 2001 Nov;28(4):456-6511732247
Cites: Am J Med. 2000 Jun 1;108(8):642-910856412
Cites: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Jan;52(1):123-714687326
Cites: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD00304114974003
Cites: Biometrics. 1977 Jun;33(2):363-74884196
Cites: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Jul 30;287(6388):324-66409291
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 1986 May;123(5):894-9003962971
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Feb;129(2):233-482643301
Cites: Am J Cardiol. 1989 Sep 15;64(10):651-42782256
Cites: Am J Public Health. 1989 Nov;79(11):1554-62817172
Cites: J Healthc Qual. 1992 May-Jun;14(3):16-2310119893
Cites: Isr J Med Sci. 1992 Oct;28(10):714-71399501
Cites: Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Apr 15;145(8):762-99126003
Cites: J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Oct;57(10):1096-10315528061
Cites: Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):266-7515725983
Cites: J Ambul Care Manage. 2005 Apr-Jun;28(2):102-1015923944
Cites: J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;58(12):1316-916291477
Cites: Pediatrics. 2006 Jan;117(1):15-2116396855
Cites: J Eval Clin Pract. 2006 Apr;12(2):155-6316579824
Cites: Eur J Gen Pract. 2006;12(4):148-5517127600
Cites: Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Mar-Apr;3(2):116-2617386392
Cites: J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;60(6):634-4217493523
Cites: Obes Surg. 2002 Feb;12(1):25-911868292
PubMed ID
18411042 View in PubMed
Less detail

A comparison of physical activity environments between South Asians and white Caucasians with coronary heart disease.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature137210
Source
Ethn Dis. 2010;20(4):390-5
Publication Type
Article
Date
2010
Author
Shazareen N Khan
Sherry L Grace
Paul Oh
Sonia Anand
Donna E Stewart
Gilbert Wu
Milan Gupta
Author Affiliation
University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Source
Ethn Dis. 2010;20(4):390-5
Date
2010
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Aged
Asia, Southeastern - ethnology
Coronary disease - ethnology
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Motor Activity
Multivariate Analysis
Ontario - epidemiology
Abstract
South Asians (SA) are predisposed to developing premature coronary heart disease (CHD), partly due to the early onset of classic risk factors, including physical inactivity. The nature of physical activity (PA) environments in South Asians in Canada remains unknown. Our objective was to examine differences in PA environments for South Asian vs White Caucasian (WC) CHD patients. In a cross-sectional study, 2657 hospitalized CHD patients in Ontario completed The Perceived Environments Related to Physical Activity Questionnaire to assess their home and neighborhood environment, perceived neighborhood safety and availability of recreational facilities. Patients self-reporting their ethnocultural background as WC (N = 1301, 48.6%) or SA (N = 171, 6.4%) were included in this study. South Asians were significantly younger, had lower body mass index, higher levels of education, lower income, were less likely to smoke and reside rurally, and were more likely to be married, have diabetes mellitus and have experienced prior myocardial infarction (MI) than WC patients. South Asians also had lower availability of home exercise equipment and perceived convenience of local PA facilities, but better and safer neighborhood environments than WC patients. Multivariate analyses revealed that SA ethnocultural background remained significantly related to reduced availability of home exercise equipment and fewer convenient local PA facilities. Since physical inactivity is an important CHD risk factor, and SA ethnocultural background is associated with high CHD risk, this may represent a novel target for risk reduction. Thus, further research is required to optimize SA awareness of the need for PA, and access to equipment and facilities.
Notes
SummaryForPatientsIn: Ethn Dis. 2010 Autumn;20(4):48821305843
PubMed ID
21305827 View in PubMed
Less detail

Continuity of cardiac care: cardiac rehabilitation participation and other correlates.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature165450
Source
Int J Cardiol. 2007 Jul 31;119(3):326-33
Publication Type
Article
Date
Jul-31-2007
Author
Dana L Riley
Donna E Stewart
Sherry L Grace
Author Affiliation
York University, Canada.
Source
Int J Cardiol. 2007 Jul 31;119(3):326-33
Date
Jul-31-2007
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Aged
Angina Pectoris - rehabilitation
Continuity of Patient Care - organization & administration
Female
Health Care Surveys
Humans
Interdisciplinary Communication
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction - rehabilitation
Ontario
Patient satisfaction
Syndrome
Universal Coverage
Abstract
Continuity of care refers to the ongoing management of a patient's care over time and across practitioners, and the patient's experience of this care as coherent and consistent with their medical needs and context. Continuity of cardiac care is integral to secondary prevention and improved health outcomes.
This study examined patient perceptions of continuity, and how they relate to cardiac rehabilitation participation and other correlates.
Consecutive acute coronary syndrome patients at 3 hospitals were approached, and 661 consented to complete a survey (504 men, 157 women; 75% response rate). Nine months later, 506 participants completed a survey including the Heart Continuity of Care Questionnaire, open-ended continuity perceptions, and self-reported cardiac rehabilitation participation (yes/no).
The mean continuity perceptions were highly positive, and were equivalent to those found in another Canadian province, although open-ended responses revealed discontinuity with regard to outpatient visits and pharmacotherapy prescriptions. In a multivariate model (p=.003), the correlates of greater perceptions of continuity of cardiac care 9 months post-discharge were cardiac rehabilitation participation (p
Notes
Cites: Am J Cardiol. 2003 May 22;91(10A):22G-27G12781905
Cites: Circulation. 2003 May 6;107(17):2201-612707240
Cites: Chest. 2003 Jun;123(6):2104-1112796195
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2003 Jun;19(7):833-812813617
Cites: CMAJ. 2003 Oct 28;169(9):905-1014581307
Cites: BMJ. 2003 Nov 22;327(7425):1219-2114630762
Cites: Psychosom Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;66(1):42-814747636
Cites: J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2004 Jan-Feb;24(1):19-2614758099
Cites: Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Feb;24(2):173-814998217
Cites: Ann Fam Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;1(3):144-815043375
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2004 Jul;20(9):883-9115266358
Cites: Ann Fam Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;2(5):445-5115506579
Cites: Am J Cardiol. 1989 Sep 15;64(10):651-42782256
Cites: Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(6):705-142035047
Cites: Am J Cardiol. 1992 May 15;69(16):1274-91585859
Cites: Psychol Bull. 1993 May;113(3):553-658316613
Cites: Am J Cardiol. 1995 Feb 15;75(5):340-37856524
Cites: Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract. 1998 Apr-Jun;2(2):64-709582818
Cites: Nurs Case Manag. 1998 Mar-Apr;3(2):79-889709098
Cites: Image J Nurs Sch. 1998;30(3):255-609753841
Cites: BMJ. 1999 Mar 13;318(7185):706-1110074017
Cites: J Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;53(12):974-8015581440
Cites: J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2005 Jan-Feb;25(1):24-915714108
Cites: Med Care. 2005 Apr;43(4):374-8015778640
Cites: Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Apr;56(4):427-3315812092
Cites: J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Mar;20(3):226-3315836525
Cites: Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Sep;56(9):1061-916148318
Cites: J Psychosom Res. 2005 Nov;59(5):315-2216253622
Cites: J Eval Clin Pract. 2006 Apr;12(2):155-6316579824
Cites: J Fam Pract. 2000 Nov;49(11):998-100411093565
Cites: Am Heart J. 2003 Jun;145(6):1086-9312796767
PubMed ID
17258332 View in PubMed
Less detail

Contribution of patient and physician factors to cardiac rehabilitation enrollment: a prospective multilevel study.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature154911
Source
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008 Oct;15(5):548-56
Publication Type
Article
Date
Oct-2008
Author
Sherry L Grace
Shannon Gravely-Witte
Janette Brual
George Monette
Neville Suskin
Lyall Higginson
David A Alter
Donna E Stewart
Author Affiliation
York University, 4700 Keele St, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada. sgrace@yorku.ca
Source
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008 Oct;15(5):548-56
Date
Oct-2008
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Adult
Aged
Attitude of Health Personnel
Coronary Artery Disease - rehabilitation
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Male
Marital status
Middle Aged
Ontario
Outpatients - psychology
Patient Education as Topic
Patient Participation
Patient Selection
Perception
Physician's Role
Physician-Patient Relations
Prospective Studies
Questionnaires
Referral and Consultation
Abstract
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an established means of reducing mortality, yet is grossly underutilized. This is due to both health system and patient-level factors; issues that have yet to be investigated concurrently. This study utilized a hierarchical design to examine physician and patient-level factors affecting verified CR enrollment.
A prospective multisite study, using a multilevel design of 1490 coronary artery disease outpatients nested within 97 Ontario cardiology practices (mean 15 per cardiologist).
Cardiologists completed a survey regarding CR attitudes. Outpatients were surveyed prospectively to assess factors affecting CR enrollment. Patients were mailed a follow-up survey 9 months later to self-report CR enrollment. This was verified with 40 CR sites.
Five hundred and fifty (43.4%) outpatients were referred, and 469 (37.0%) enrolled in CR. In mixed logistic regression analyses, factors affecting verified CR enrollment were greater strength of physician endorsement (P=0.005), shorter distance to CR (P=0.001), being married (P=0.01), and fewer perceived CR barriers (P=0.03).
Both physician and patient factors play a part in CR enrollment. Patient CR barriers should be addressed during referral discussions, and reasons why physicians fail to uniformly endorse CR exploration. Although distance to CR was related to patient enrollment patterns, greater access to home-based CR services should be provided.
Notes
Cites: Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jan 15;83(2):252-5, A510073829
Cites: Health Psychol. 2001 Mar;20(2):141-511315732
Cites: Cardiol Rev. 2008 Jan-Feb;16(1):36-5218091401
Cites: J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;54(10):1025-3011576814
Cites: Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2002 Winter;17(1):8-1711872976
Cites: Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2002 May-Jun;24(3):121-612062135
Cites: Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2002 May-Jun;24(3):127-3412062136
Cites: Clin Rehabil. 2002 Aug;16(5):541-5212194625
Cites: J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2002 Nov;11(9):773-9112632591
Cites: Med J Aust. 2003 Oct 6;179(7):332-314503890
Cites: J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2003 Nov-Dec;23(6):398-40314646785
Cites: Am J Med. 2004 May 15;116(10):682-9215121495
Cites: Med Care. 2004 Jul;42(7):661-915213491
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2004 Sep;20(11):1101-715457306
Cites: Res Nurs Health. 1987 Dec;10(6):357-653423307
Cites: Am J Cardiol. 1989 Sep 15;64(10):651-42782256
Cites: Am J Cardiol. 1991 Oct 1;68(9):973-51927964
Cites: Am J Cardiol. 1992 Jun 1;69(17):1422-51590231
Cites: J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Feb;46(2):153-628437031
Cites: JAMA. 1993 Oct 20;270(15):1819-258411525
Cites: J Health Soc Behav. 1995 Mar;36(1):1-107738325
Cites: Public Health Nurs. 1998 Aug;15(4):288-969682622
Cites: J Womens Health. 1998 Aug;7(6):717-239718540
Cites: Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1999 Mar-Apr;21(2):106-1110228890
Cites: Heart. 1999 Aug;82(2):234-610409543
Cites: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-7113688369
Cites: Heart. 2005 Jan;91(1):10-415604322
Cites: J Adv Nurs. 2005 Mar;49(5):538-5515713186
Cites: Rev Port Cardiol. 2005 Apr;24(4):507-1615977775
Cites: Int J Cardiol. 2006 Aug 28;111(3):343-5116316695
Cites: Prev Cardiol. 2007 Winter;10(1):15-2117215628
Cites: Eur Heart J. 2007 Jan;28(2):160-517185305
Cites: J Rehabil Med. 2007 Apr;39(3):239-4517468793
Cites: Int J Cardiol. 2007 Jul 10;119(2):196-20117084927
Cites: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(1):CD00180011279730
PubMed ID
18830085 View in PubMed
Less detail

Contribution of patient and physician factors to cardiac rehabilitation referral: a prospective multilevel study.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature156787
Source
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008 Oct;5(10):653-62
Publication Type
Article
Date
Oct-2008
Author
Sherry L Grace
Shannon Gravely-Witte
Janette Brual
Neville Suskin
Lyall Higginson
David Alter
Donna E Stewart
Author Affiliation
York University, Toronto, ON, Canada. sgrace@yorku.ca
Source
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008 Oct;5(10):653-62
Date
Oct-2008
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Aged
Ambulatory Care - statistics & numerical data
Attitude of Health Personnel
Comprehension
Coronary Artery Disease - rehabilitation
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Services Accessibility
Health Services Research
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Ontario
Outpatients - psychology - statistics & numerical data
Patient Education as Topic
Perception
Physician-Patient Relations
Physicians - psychology - statistics & numerical data
Prospective Studies
Quality of Health Care
Questionnaires
Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data
Abstract
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR), in most developed countries, is a proven means of reducing mortality but it is grossly underutilized owing to factors involving both the health system and patients. These issues have not been investigated concurrently. To this end, we employed a hierarchical design to investigate physician and patient factors that affect verified CR referral.
This study was prospective with a multilevel design. We assessed 1,490 outpatients with coronary artery disease attending 97 cardiology practices. Cardiologists completed a survey about attitudes to CR referral. Outpatients were surveyed prospectively to assess sociodemographic, clinical, behavioral, psychosocial and health system factors that affected CR referral. Responses were analyzed by mixed logistic regression analyses. After 9 months, CR referral was verified at 40 centers.
Health-care providers referred 550 (43.4%) outpatients to CR. Factors affecting verified referral included positive physician perceptions of CR (P = 0.03), short distance to the closest CR site (P = 0.003), the perception of fewer barriers to CR (P
Notes
Cites: Am J Prev Med. 2001 Jan;20(1):61-711137777
Cites: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 2;50(14):1400-3317903645
Cites: Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2002 Winter;17(1):8-1711872976
Cites: Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2002 May-Jun;24(3):127-3412062136
Cites: Clin Rehabil. 2002 Aug;16(5):541-5212194625
Cites: J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2002 Nov;11(9):773-9112632591
Cites: Med J Aust. 2003 Oct 6;179(7):332-314503890
Cites: J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2003 Nov-Dec;23(6):398-40314646785
Cites: Rehabil Nurs. 2004 Jan-Feb;29(1):18-2314727472
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jan 26;164(2):203-914744845
Cites: Am J Med. 2004 May 15;116(10):682-9215121495
Cites: Med Care. 2004 Jul;42(7):661-915213491
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2004 Sep;20(11):1101-715457306
Cites: Res Nurs Health. 1987 Dec;10(6):357-653423307
Cites: Am J Cardiol. 1989 Sep 15;64(10):651-42782256
Cites: J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Feb;46(2):153-628437031
Cites: JAMA. 1993 Oct 20;270(15):1819-258411525
Cites: BMJ. 1996 May 11;312(7040):1191-48634561
Cites: Public Health Nurs. 1998 Aug;15(4):288-969682622
Cites: Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jan 15;83(2):252-5, A510073829
Cites: Heart. 1999 Sep;82(3):373-710455092
Cites: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-7113688369
Cites: Heart. 2005 Jan;91(1):10-415604322
Cites: J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2004 Nov-Dec;24(6):387-9115632773
Cites: J Adv Nurs. 2005 Mar;49(5):538-5515713186
Cites: Int J Cardiol. 2006 Aug 28;111(3):343-5116316695
Cites: J Rehabil Med. 2007 Apr;39(3):239-4517468793
Cites: Int J Cardiol. 2007 Jul 10;119(2):196-20117084927
Comment On: Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008 Oct;5(10):671-218695694
PubMed ID
18542104 View in PubMed
Less detail

Cultural factors facilitating cardiac rehabilitation participation among Canadian South Asians: a qualitative study.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature142742
Source
Heart Lung. 2010 Nov-Dec;39(6):494-503
Publication Type
Article
Author
Ananya Tina Banerjee
Sherry L Grace
Scott G Thomas
Guy Faulkner
Author Affiliation
Health Research Methodology Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. banerjat@mcmaster.ca
Source
Heart Lung. 2010 Nov-Dec;39(6):494-503
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Adult
Aged
Asia - ethnology
Cardiovascular Diseases - epidemiology - ethnology - rehabilitation
Culture
Female
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Middle Aged
Ontario - epidemiology
Patient Acceptance of Health Care - ethnology
Patient Participation - statistics & numerical data
Qualitative Research
Abstract
South Asians experience high rates of cardiovascular disease, yet participate in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) at low rates. Drawing on the Predisposing, Reinforcing, and Enabling Constructs in Educational Diagnosis and Evaluation (PRECEDE) model, this qualitative descriptive study sought to identify cultural factors facilitating South Asians' participation in CR programs.
Two semistructured interviews were conducted with each of 16 Canadian South Asian participants enrolled in a 12-month CR program. Transcribed data were analyzed for common themes, and categorized in terms of predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing factors.
Primary cultural facilitators included descriptions of CR as a "medically supervised" program, family and physician support, and previous knowledge of CR via members of the South Asian community.
Previous research identified barriers to CR participation in the South Asian community, and this study is the first to identify facilitators. Results suggest that families should be included in patient-education sessions, CR should be reinforced by healthcare providers, and the provider team should recognize cultural preferences.
PubMed ID
20561846 View in PubMed
Less detail

Degree and correlates of cardiac knowledge and awareness among cardiac inpatients.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature154543
Source
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Apr;75(1):99-107
Publication Type
Article
Date
Apr-2009
Author
Sheena Kayaniyil
Chris I Ardern
Jane Winstanley
Cynthia Parsons
Stephanie Brister
Paul Oh
Donna E Stewart
Sherry L Grace
Author Affiliation
York University, Canada.
Source
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Apr;75(1):99-107
Date
Apr-2009
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Aged
Coronary Disease - prevention & control - rehabilitation
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Linear Models
Male
Ontario
Patient Education as Topic
Socioeconomic Factors
Abstract
To investigate the degree of CHD awareness as well as symptom, risk factor, and treatment knowledge in a broad sample of cardiac inpatients, and to examine its sociodemographic, clinical and psychosocial correlates.
1308 CHD inpatients (351 [27.0%] female), recruited from 11 acute care sites in Ontario, participated in this cross-sectional study. Participants were provided with a survey which included a knowledge questionnaire among other measures, and clinical data were extracted from medical charts.
855 (68.8%) respondents cited heart disease as the leading cause of death in men, versus only 458 (37.0%) in women. Participants with less than high school education (p
Notes
Cites: CMAJ. 1999;161(8 Suppl):S10-610551207
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jul 23;167(14):1503-917646604
Cites: Circulation. 2000 Apr 25;101(16):1913-810779456
Cites: CMAJ. 2000;162(9 Suppl):S5-1110813022
Cites: Postgrad Med. 2000 May 15;107(6):111-6; quiz 15610865871
Cites: J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000 Sep;9(7):769-7711025869
Cites: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Mar;49(3):284-911300239
Cites: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Jul;55(7):475-8211413176
Cites: Public Health. 2001 Jul;115(4):253-6011464296
Cites: Lancet. 2001 Oct 13;358(9289):1213-711675057
Cites: J Cardiovasc Risk. 2001 Dec;8(6):371-711873093
Cites: Crit Care Nurse. 2000 Apr;20(2):70-3, 75-611873753
Cites: Am J Crit Care. 2002 May;11(3):221-712022485
Cites: Womens Health Issues. 2003 Jan-Feb;13(1):23-3112598056
Cites: Ital Heart J. 2003 Aug;4(8):551-814564982
Cites: Psychosom Med. 2004 Jan-Feb;66(1):42-814747636
Cites: J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004 Jan-Feb;19(1):13-2014994778
Cites: Ann Epidemiol. 2004 Feb;14(2):143-5015018888
Cites: Postgrad Med. 1975 Jun;57(7):129-34165473
Cites: Heart Lung. 1975 Sep-Oct;4(5):759-66170235
Cites: J Health Soc Behav. 1977 Dec;18(4):348-66617639
Cites: Psychosom Med. 1979 May;41(3):229-42314119
Cites: Heart Lung. 1980 Sep-Oct;9(5):846-536904414
Cites: Scand J Caring Sci. 1987;1(1):23-313649869
Cites: J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(7):597-6092668448
Cites: Am J Cardiol. 1989 Sep 15;64(10):651-42782256
Cites: Nurse Pract. 1991 Apr;16(4):28, 31, 35-82062470
Cites: Am J Cardiol. 1991 Oct 1;68(9):973-51927964
Cites: Prev Med. 1991 Nov;20(6):725-361766944
Cites: Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 1992 Mar-Apr;11(2):68-741576901
Cites: Am J Crit Care. 1994 Sep;3(5):368-738000460
Cites: BMJ. 1996 May 11;312(7040):1191-48634561
Cites: BMJ. 1997 Feb 22;314(7080):541-69055711
Cites: BMJ. 1997 Feb 22;314(7080):547-529055712
Cites: Heart Lung. 1997 Mar-Apr;26(2):92-89090513
Cites: J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 May;50(5):541-69180646
Cites: Clin Invest Med. 1997 Aug;20(4):204-109258575
Cites: Arch Intern Med. 1998 Jan 26;158(2):166-729448555
Cites: Heart. 1999 Aug;82(2):234-610409543
Cites: Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004 Dec;3(4):321-3015572021
Cites: Circulation. 2005 Mar 15;111(10):1233-4115769763
Cites: N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 18;353(7):671-8216107620
Cites: J Psychosom Res. 2005 Nov;59(5):323-916253623
Cites: BMC Public Health. 2005;5:12416309553
Cites: Circulation. 2006 Jan 31;113(4):525-3416449732
Cites: BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2006;6:1816643643
Cites: Emerg Med Australas. 2006 Jun;18(3):252-816712535
Cites: J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2006 Sep-Oct;21(5):E24-3116966907
Cites: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Jan;133(1):150-417198803
Cites: Med J Aust. 2007 Jan 1;186(1):21-517229029
Cites: CMAJ. 2007 Mar 13;176(6):S1-4417353516
Cites: Can J Cardiol. 2000 Jan;16 Suppl A:5A-10A10653924
PubMed ID
18952393 View in PubMed
Less detail

32 records – page 1 of 4.