Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) aim to improve clinical practice by engaging dental practitioners in studies that are directly relevant to daily clinical practice. The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) consists of dentists from seven U.S. states and three Scandinavian countries. All DPBRN dentists complete an enrollment questionnaire about their practices and themselves; as of this writing, 1,086 have done so. To quantify the similarities between DPBRN dentists and U.S. dentists at large, this article compared DPBRN practice characteristics to those of dentists who responded to the 2004 ADA Survey of dental practice, which is not limited to ADA members. DPBRN dentists were similar to U.S. dentists in terms of gender, race, ethnicity, number of offices, percentage of patients with insurance coverage, number of operatories, patient visits per week, days for a new appointment, and waiting room time. DPBRN dentists were statistically more likely to be recent graduates. The commonalities should increase the likelihood that DPBRN studies will be applicable to U.S. practices, thereby fostering knowledge transfer in both research-to-practice and practice-to-research.
Notes
Cites: BMJ. 2001 Mar 10;322(7286):567-811238139
Cites: Ann Fam Med. 2007 May-Jun;5(3):242-5017548852
Cites: N Engl J Med. 2001 Jun 28;344(26):2021-511430334
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Jan;134(1):103-712555963
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 May;134(5):621-712785498
Cites: N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 28;349(9):868-7412944573
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Dec;134(12):1630-4014719761
Cites: Med Care. 2004 Apr;42(4 Suppl):III45-915026664
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 1998 Oct;129(10):1474-99787548
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 1997 May;128(5):651-39150651
Cites: Ann Fam Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;2(5):425-815506575
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 1998 Nov;129(11):1615-219818583
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 1999 Mar;130(3):424-3010085668
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Oct;135(10):1362, 1364, 136615551971
Cites: Ann Fam Med. 2005 May-Jun;3 Suppl 1:S12-2015928213
Cites: Ann Fam Med. 2005 May-Jun;3 Suppl 1:S5-1115928219
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 2005 Jun;136(6):728-3716022037
Effectively addressing challenges of conducting research in nonacademic settings is crucial to its success. A dental practice-based research network called The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) is comprised of practitioner- investigators in two health maintenance organizations, several universities, many U.S. states, and three Scandinavian countries. Our objective in this article is to describe lessons learned from conducting studies in this research context; the studies are conducted by clinicians in community settings who may be doing their first research study. To date, twenty-one studies have been completed or are in implementation. These include a broad range of topic areas, enrollment sizes, and study designs. A total of 1,126 practitioner-investigators have participated in at least one study. After excluding one study because it involved electronic records queries only, these studies included more than 70,000 patient/participant units. Because the DPBRN is committed to being both practitioner- and patient-driven, all studies must be approved by its Executive Committee and a formal study section of academic clinical scientists. As a result of interacting with a diverse range of institutional and regulatory entities, funding agencies, practitioners, clinic staff, patients, academic scientists, and geographic areas, twenty-three key lessons have been learned. Patients' acceptance of these studies has been very high, judging from high participation rates and their completion of data forms. Early studies substantially informed later studies with regard to study design, practicality, forms design, informed consent process, and training and monitoring methods. Although time-intensive and complex, these solutions improved acceptability of practice-based research to patients, practitioners, and university researchers.
Notes
Cites: Acad Med. 2010 Mar;85(3):476-8320182121
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Apr;141(4):441-820354094
Cites: Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2010 Mar;235(3):290-920404046
Cites: J Public Health Dent. 2010 Winter;70(1):19-2719694937
Cites: Child Care Health Dev. 2010 May;36(3):385-9120507330
The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) provided a means to investigate whether certain procedures were performed routinely. The authors conducted a study to quantify rubber dam use during root canal treatment (RCT) among general dentists and to test the hypothesis that certain dentist or practice characteristics were associated with rubber dam use.
DPBRN practitioner-investigators (P-Is) answered a questionnaire that included items about rubber dam use and other forms of isolation during RCT. DPBRN enrollment questionnaire data provided information regarding practitioner and practice characteristics.
A total of 729 (74 percent) of 991 P-Is responded; 524 were general dentists who reported providing at least some RCTs and reported the percentage of RCTs for which they used a rubber dam. Of these 524 P-Is, 44 percent used a rubber dam for all RCTs, 24 percent used it for 51 to 99 percent of RCTs, 17 percent used it for 1 to 50 percent of RCTs, and 15 percent never used it during RCT. Usage varied significantly by geographic region and practice type. The use of cotton rolls and other forms of isolation also was reported.
Similar to other reports in the literature, not all DPBRN general dentists used a rubber dam during RCT.
Because the clinical reference standard is to use a rubber dam during RCT, increasing its use may be important.
Notes
Cites: Int Endod J. 2007 Aug;40(8):585-917532776
Cites: Int Endod J. 2007 Jun;40(6):427-3217501755
Cites: Int Endod J. 2001 Jan;34(1):16-2211307376
Cites: Int Endod J. 2000 Sep;33(5):435-4111307462
Cites: N Z Dent J. 2002 Mar;98(431):12-612017902
Cites: Int Endod J. 2002 Sep;35(9):759-6712449027
Cites: Int Endod J. 2003 Mar;36(3):166-7312657142
Cites: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1979 Sep;48(3):269-71289931
Cites: Oper Dent. 1984 Autumn;9(4):122-96596553
Cites: Gen Dent. 1989 Jan-Feb;37(1):50-12599320
Cites: Oper Dent. 1989 Autumn;14(4):176-812639317
Cites: Br Dent J. 1990 Nov 10;169(9):286-912261277
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Jan;139(1):74-8118167389
