Skip header and navigation

3 records – page 1 of 1.

Dentists in practice-based research networks have much in common with dentists at large: evidence from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature148048
Source
Gen Dent. 2009 May-Jun;57(3):270-5
Publication Type
Article
Author
Sonia K Makhija
Gregg H Gilbert
D Brad Rindal
Paul L Benjamin
Joshua S Richman
Daniel J Pihlstrom
Author Affiliation
Department of Diagnostic Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry, AL, USA.
Source
Gen Dent. 2009 May-Jun;57(3):270-5
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Community-Based Participatory Research - organization & administration
Dental Research - organization & administration
Dentist's Practice Patterns - statistics & numerical data
Ethnic Groups - statistics & numerical data
Female
Humans
Male
Questionnaires
Scandinavia
Translational Medical Research - organization & administration
United States
Abstract
Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) aim to improve clinical practice by engaging dental practitioners in studies that are directly relevant to daily clinical practice. The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) consists of dentists from seven U.S. states and three Scandinavian countries. All DPBRN dentists complete an enrollment questionnaire about their practices and themselves; as of this writing, 1,086 have done so. To quantify the similarities between DPBRN dentists and U.S. dentists at large, this article compared DPBRN practice characteristics to those of dentists who responded to the 2004 ADA Survey of dental practice, which is not limited to ADA members. DPBRN dentists were similar to U.S. dentists in terms of gender, race, ethnicity, number of offices, percentage of patients with insurance coverage, number of operatories, patient visits per week, days for a new appointment, and waiting room time. DPBRN dentists were statistically more likely to be recent graduates. The commonalities should increase the likelihood that DPBRN studies will be applicable to U.S. practices, thereby fostering knowledge transfer in both research-to-practice and practice-to-research.
Notes
Cites: BMJ. 2001 Mar 10;322(7286):567-811238139
Cites: Ann Fam Med. 2007 May-Jun;5(3):242-5017548852
Cites: N Engl J Med. 2001 Jun 28;344(26):2021-511430334
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Jan;134(1):103-712555963
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 May;134(5):621-712785498
Cites: N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 28;349(9):868-7412944573
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 Dec;134(12):1630-4014719761
Cites: Med Care. 2004 Apr;42(4 Suppl):III45-915026664
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 1998 Oct;129(10):1474-99787548
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 1997 May;128(5):651-39150651
Cites: Ann Fam Med. 2004 Sep-Oct;2(5):425-815506575
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 1998 Nov;129(11):1615-219818583
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 1999 Mar;130(3):424-3010085668
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Oct;135(10):1362, 1364, 136615551971
Cites: Ann Fam Med. 2005 May-Jun;3 Suppl 1:S12-2015928213
Cites: Ann Fam Med. 2005 May-Jun;3 Suppl 1:S5-1115928219
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 2005 Jun;136(6):728-3716022037
Cites: Acta Odontol Scand. 2005 Feb;63(1):1-916095055
Cites: J Am Board Fam Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;19(1):1-1016491999
Cites: Pediatrics. 2006 Aug;118(2):e228-3416831892
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Nov;137(11):1488-90, 1492, 149417082265
Cites: JAMA. 2007 Jan 24;297(4):403-617244837
Cites: J Am Board Fam Med. 2007 Mar-Apr;20(2):204-1917341758
Cites: BMJ. 2001 Mar 10;322(7286):588-9011238155
PubMed ID
19819818 View in PubMed
Less detail

Lessons learned during the conduct of clinical studies in the dental PBRN.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature135633
Source
J Dent Educ. 2011 Apr;75(4):453-65
Publication Type
Article
Date
Apr-2011
Author
Gregg H Gilbert
Joshua S Richman
Valeria V Gordan
D Brad Rindal
Jeffrey L Fellows
Paul L Benjamin
Martha Wallace-Dawson
O Dale Williams
Author Affiliation
Birmingham, SDB Room 109, 1530 3 Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-0007, USA. ghg@uab.edu
Source
J Dent Educ. 2011 Apr;75(4):453-65
Date
Apr-2011
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Community-Based Participatory Research
Data Collection
Dental Research - methods
Dentist's Practice Patterns
Humans
Patient Participation
Research Design
Research Personnel
Scandinavia
United States
Abstract
Effectively addressing challenges of conducting research in nonacademic settings is crucial to its success. A dental practice-based research network called The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) is comprised of practitioner- investigators in two health maintenance organizations, several universities, many U.S. states, and three Scandinavian countries. Our objective in this article is to describe lessons learned from conducting studies in this research context; the studies are conducted by clinicians in community settings who may be doing their first research study. To date, twenty-one studies have been completed or are in implementation. These include a broad range of topic areas, enrollment sizes, and study designs. A total of 1,126 practitioner-investigators have participated in at least one study. After excluding one study because it involved electronic records queries only, these studies included more than 70,000 patient/participant units. Because the DPBRN is committed to being both practitioner- and patient-driven, all studies must be approved by its Executive Committee and a formal study section of academic clinical scientists. As a result of interacting with a diverse range of institutional and regulatory entities, funding agencies, practitioners, clinic staff, patients, academic scientists, and geographic areas, twenty-three key lessons have been learned. Patients' acceptance of these studies has been very high, judging from high participation rates and their completion of data forms. Early studies substantially informed later studies with regard to study design, practicality, forms design, informed consent process, and training and monitoring methods. Although time-intensive and complex, these solutions improved acceptability of practice-based research to patients, practitioners, and university researchers.
Notes
Cites: Acad Med. 2010 Mar;85(3):476-8320182121
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Apr;141(4):441-820354094
Cites: Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2010 Mar;235(3):290-920404046
Cites: J Public Health Dent. 2010 Winter;70(1):19-2719694937
Cites: Child Care Health Dev. 2010 May;36(3):385-9120507330
Cites: Gen Dent. 2010 Nov-Dec;58(6):520-821062721
Cites: J Investig Med. 2003 Mar;51(2):64-7112643510
Cites: Med Care. 2004 Apr;42(4 Suppl):III45-915026664
Cites: Ann Fam Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;4(1):8-1416449391
Cites: J Am Board Fam Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;19(1):1-1016491999
Cites: J Am Board Fam Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;19(1):75-8416492009
Cites: JAMA. 2007 Jan 24;297(4):403-617244837
Cites: J Am Board Fam Med. 2007 Mar-Apr;20(2):105-1417341746
Cites: J Am Board Fam Med. 2007 Mar-Apr;20(2):181-717341755
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Jan;139(1):74-8118167389
Cites: J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(5):e3818984559
Cites: Circulation. 2009 May 19;119(19):2633-4219451365
Cites: J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(4):428-3519587258
Cites: Gen Dent. 2009 May-Jun;57(3):270-519819818
Cites: BMC Oral Health. 2009;9:2619832991
PubMed ID
21460266 View in PubMed
Less detail

Rubber dam use during root canal treatment: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature116694
Source
J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Feb;144(2):179-86
Publication Type
Article
Date
Feb-2013
Author
Mona F Anabtawi
Gregg H Gilbert
Michael R Bauer
Gregg Reams
Sonia K Makhija
Paul L Benjamin
O. Dale Williams
Author Affiliation
Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Source
J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Feb;144(2):179-86
Date
Feb-2013
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Community-Based Participatory Research
Cross-Sectional Studies
European Continental Ancestry Group - statistics & numerical data
Female
General Practice, Dental - statistics & numerical data
Group Practice - statistics & numerical data
Hispanic Americans - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Managed Care Programs - statistics & numerical data
Private Practice - statistics & numerical data
Professional Practice Location - statistics & numerical data
Public Health Dentistry - statistics & numerical data
Root Canal Therapy - instrumentation
Rubber Dams - utilization
Scandinavia
United States
Abstract
The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) provided a means to investigate whether certain procedures were performed routinely. The authors conducted a study to quantify rubber dam use during root canal treatment (RCT) among general dentists and to test the hypothesis that certain dentist or practice characteristics were associated with rubber dam use.
DPBRN practitioner-investigators (P-Is) answered a questionnaire that included items about rubber dam use and other forms of isolation during RCT. DPBRN enrollment questionnaire data provided information regarding practitioner and practice characteristics.
A total of 729 (74 percent) of 991 P-Is responded; 524 were general dentists who reported providing at least some RCTs and reported the percentage of RCTs for which they used a rubber dam. Of these 524 P-Is, 44 percent used a rubber dam for all RCTs, 24 percent used it for 51 to 99 percent of RCTs, 17 percent used it for 1 to 50 percent of RCTs, and 15 percent never used it during RCT. Usage varied significantly by geographic region and practice type. The use of cotton rolls and other forms of isolation also was reported.
Similar to other reports in the literature, not all DPBRN general dentists used a rubber dam during RCT.
Because the clinical reference standard is to use a rubber dam during RCT, increasing its use may be important.
Notes
Cites: Int Endod J. 2007 Aug;40(8):585-917532776
Cites: Int Endod J. 2007 Jun;40(6):427-3217501755
Cites: Int Endod J. 2001 Jan;34(1):16-2211307376
Cites: Int Endod J. 2000 Sep;33(5):435-4111307462
Cites: N Z Dent J. 2002 Mar;98(431):12-612017902
Cites: Int Endod J. 2002 Sep;35(9):759-6712449027
Cites: Int Endod J. 2003 Mar;36(3):166-7312657142
Cites: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1979 Sep;48(3):269-71289931
Cites: Oper Dent. 1984 Autumn;9(4):122-96596553
Cites: Gen Dent. 1989 Jan-Feb;37(1):50-12599320
Cites: Oper Dent. 1989 Autumn;14(4):176-812639317
Cites: Br Dent J. 1990 Nov 10;169(9):286-912261277
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Jan;139(1):74-8118167389
Cites: Int Endod J. 2008 Jul;41(7):617-2218479380
Cites: J Dent Educ. 2008 Oct;72(10):1177-8118923098
Cites: Br Dent J. 2009 Jun 13;206(11):E22; discussion 584-519478812
Cites: Gen Dent. 2009 May-Jun;57(3):270-519819818
Cites: Int Endod J. 2009 Nov;42(11):963-7219825034
Cites: BMC Oral Health. 2009;9:2619832991
Cites: J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2009 Dec;9(4):194-619913733
Cites: J Public Health Dent. 2010 Winter;70(1):19-2719694937
Cites: Oper Dent. 2010 Sep-Oct;35(5):491-920945739
Cites: Gen Dent. 2010 Nov-Dec;58(6):520-821062721
Cites: J Dent Educ. 2011 Apr;75(4):453-6521460266
Cites: J Formos Med Assoc. 2011 Jun;110(6):397-40021741008
Cites: Aust Endod J. 2011 Aug;37(2):76-821771188
Cites: Br Dent J. 1999 Nov 27;187(10):548-5410630043
Cites: Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007 Jan;17(1):50-617181579
Cites: Int Endod J. 2006 Dec;39(12):921-3017180780
Cites: Br Dent J. 2004 Dec 25;197(12):753-6; discussion 74715608740
Cites: J Am Dent Assoc. 1996 Sep;127(9):1333-418854609
Comment In: J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Jun;144(6):57423729451
Comment In: J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Jun;144(6):574-623729453
Comment In: J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Jun;144(6):57423729452
Comment In: J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Jun;144(6):572-423729450
PubMed ID
23372134 View in PubMed
Less detail