Skip header and navigation

2 records – page 1 of 1.

Reassessment of multiple species of Gymnelus (Teleostei: Zoarcidae) in Pacific Arctic and boreal regions.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature262474
Source
Zootaxa. 2015;3948(2):263-78
Publication Type
Article
Date
2015
Author
Catherine W Mecklenburg
M Eric Anderson
Source
Zootaxa. 2015;3948(2):263-78
Date
2015
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Abstract
Recently described new nominal species and resurrected species in the eelpout genus Gymnelus Reinhardt 1834 were reassessed for validity using fresh material collected in Pacific Arctic regions and a large body of data from a previous systematic review of the genus. The analysis reported here included both DNA barcodes and morphology. Only two species were validated: G. viridis (Fabricius 1780) and G. hemifasciatus Andriashev 1937. The latter species occurred as two morphotypes for which there is some evidence of difference in ecological preference, but the available environ-mental data are not robust enough to firmly identify or verify ecophenotypes.
PubMed ID
25947776 View in PubMed
Less detail

Reassessment of multiple species of Gymnelus (Teleostei: Zoarcidae) in Pacific Arctic and boreal regions.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature265323
Source
Zootaxa. 2015;3964(2):300
Publication Type
Article
Date
2015
Author
Catherine W Mecklenburg
M Eric Anderson
Source
Zootaxa. 2015;3964(2):300
Date
2015
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Abstract
Recently described new nominal species and resurrected species in the eelpout genus Gymnelus Reinhardt 1834 were reassessed for validity using fresh material collected in Pacific Arctic regions and a large body of data from a previous systematic review of the genus. The analysis reported here included both DNA barcodes and morphology. Only two species were validated: G. viridis (Fabricius 1780) and G. hemifasciatus Andriashev 1937. The latter species occurred as two morphotypes for which there is some evidence of difference in ecological preference, but the available environ-mental data are not robust enough to firmly identify or verify ecophenotypes.
PubMed ID
26249440 View in PubMed
Less detail