Skip header and navigation

1 records – page 1 of 1.

Volcanic ash and daily mortality in Sweden after the Icelandic volcano eruption of May 2011.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature257134
Source
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Dec;10(12):6909-19
Publication Type
Article
Date
Dec-2013
Author
Anna Oudin
Hanne K Carlsen
Bertil Forsberg
Christer Johansson
Author Affiliation
Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå 90187, Sweden. anna.oudin@envmed.umu.se.
Source
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Dec;10(12):6909-19
Date
Dec-2013
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Cardiovascular Diseases - mortality
Environmental Exposure
Environmental monitoring
Iceland
Particle Size
Particulate Matter - adverse effects - analysis
Respiratory Tract Diseases - mortality
Risk factors
Seasons
Sweden - epidemiology
Time Factors
Volcanic Eruptions - adverse effects
Abstract
In the aftermath of the Icelandic volcano Grimsvötn's eruption on 21 May 2011, volcanic ash reached Northern Europe. Elevated levels of ambient particles (PM) were registered in mid Sweden. The aim of the present study was to investigate if the Grimsvötn eruption had an effect on mortality in Sweden. Based on PM measurements at 16 sites across Sweden, data were classified into an ash exposed data set (Ash area) and an unexposed data set (No ash area). Data on daily all-cause mortality were obtained from Statistics Sweden for the time period 1 April through 31 July 2011. Mortality ratios were calculated as the ratio between the daily number of deaths in the Ash area and the No ash area. The exposure period was defined as the week following the days with elevated particle concentrations, namely 24 May through 31 May. The control period was defined as 1 April through 23 May and 1 June through 31 July. There was no absolute increase in mortality during the exposure period. However, during the exposure period the mean mortality ratio was 2.42 compared with 2.17 during the control period, implying a relatively higher number of deaths in the Ash area than in the No ash area. The differences in ratios were mostly due to a single day, 31 May, and were not statistically significant when tested with a Mann-Whitney non-parametric test (p > 0.3). The statistical power was low with only 8 days in the exposure period (24 May through 31 May). Assuming that the observed relative differences were not due to chance, the results would imply an increase of 128 deaths during the exposure period 24-31 May. If 31 May was excluded, the number of extra deaths was reduced to 20. The results of the present study are contradicting and inconclusive, but may indicate that all-cause mortality was increased by the ash-fall from the Grimsvötn eruption. Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of data from neighboring countries might make it possible to reach sufficient statistical power to study effects of the Grimsvötn ash on morbidity and mortality. Such studies would be of particular importance for European societies preparing for future large scale volcanic eruptions in Iceland.
Notes
Cites: Occup Environ Med. 2006 Feb;63(2):149-56, 12516421396
Cites: Environ Health Perspect. 2000 May;108(5):419-2610811568
Cites: Environ Res. 2012 Feb;113:33-922264878
Cites: Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Mar;120(3):431-622182596
Cites: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 20;108(38):15710-521930954
Cites: Neuroepidemiology. 2010;34(3):131-4220068360
Cites: Circulation. 2006 Dec 5;114(23):2443-817101851
Cites: JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1127-3416522832
PubMed ID
24336019 View in PubMed
Less detail