Skip header and navigation

1 records – page 1 of 1.

Aflibercept vs. Ranibizumab: cost-effectiveness of treatment for wet age-related macular degeneration in Sweden.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature279115
Source
Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;94(5):441-8
Publication Type
Article
Date
Aug-2016
Author
Hemangi R Panchmatia
Karen M Clements
Erin Hulbert
Marianne Eriksson
Kim Wittrup-Jensen
Jonas Nilsson
Milton C Weinstein
Source
Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;94(5):441-8
Date
Aug-2016
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angiogenesis Inhibitors - administration & dosage - economics
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Health Care Costs
Humans
Intravitreal Injections
Male
Markov Chains
Middle Aged
Models, Statistical
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Ranibizumab - administration & dosage - economics
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor - administration & dosage
Recombinant Fusion Proteins - administration & dosage - economics
Sweden
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A - antagonists & inhibitors
Visual Acuity - drug effects
Wet Macular Degeneration - drug therapy - economics
Abstract
Monthly dosing with ranibizumab (RBZ) is needed to achieve maximal visual gains in patients with neovascular ('wet') age-related macular degeneration (wAMD). In Sweden, dosing is performed as needed (RBZ PRN), resulting in suboptimal efficacy. Intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) every 2 months after three initial monthly doses was clinically equivalent to RBZ monthly dosing (RBZ q4) in wAMD clinical trials. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of IVT-AFL versus RBZ q4 and RBZ PRN in Sweden.
A Markov model compared IVT-AFL to RBZ q4 or RBZ PRN over 2 years. Health states were based on visual acuity in better-seeing eye; a proportion discontinued treatment monthly or upon visual acuity
PubMed ID
27061020 View in PubMed
Less detail