Skip header and navigation

Refine By

5 records – page 1 of 1.

Randomised social-skills training and parental training plus standard treatment versus standard treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder - the SOSTRA trial protocol.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature137704
Source
Trials. 2011;12:18
Publication Type
Article
Date
2011
Author
Ole Jakob Storebø
Jesper Pedersen
Maria Skoog
Per Hove Thomsen
Per Winkel
Christian Gluud
Erik Simonsen
Author Affiliation
Child Psychiatric Daytime Clinic, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Centre, Region Zealand, Holbaek, Denmark. ojst@regionsjaelland.dk
Source
Trials. 2011;12:18
Date
2011
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - diagnosis - drug therapy - psychology - therapy
Child
Child Behavior
Cognition
Combined Modality Therapy
Denmark
Emotions
Female
Humans
Male
Parents - psychology
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Questionnaires
Research Design
Sample Size
Social Behavior
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Abstract
Children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are hyperactive and impulsive, cannot maintain attention, and have difficulties with social interactions. Medical treatment may alleviate symptoms of ADHD, but seldom solves difficulties with social interactions. Social-skills training may benefit ADHD children in their social interactions. We want to examine the effects of social-skills training on difficulties related to the children's ADHD symptoms and social interactions.
The design is randomised two-armed, parallel group, assessor-blinded trial. Children aged 8-12 years with a diagnosis of ADHD are randomised to social-skills training and parental training plus standard treatment versus standard treatment alone. A sample size calculation estimated that at least 52 children must be included to show a 4-point difference in the primary outcome on the Conners 3rd Edition subscale for 'hyperactivity-impulsivity' between the intervention group and the control group. The outcomes will be assessed 3 and 6 months after randomisation. The primary outcome measure is ADHD symptoms. The secondary outcome is social skills. Tertiary outcomes include the relationship between social skills and symptoms of ADHD, the ability to form attachment, and parents' ADHD symptoms.
We hope that the results from this trial will show that the social-skills training together with medication may have a greater general effect on ADHD symptoms and social and emotional competencies than medication alone.
ClinicalTrials (NCT): NCT00937469.
Notes
Cites: Can J Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;44(10):1007-1610637680
Cites: Am J Psychiatry. 2000 May;157(5):816-810784477
Cites: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;40(2):147-5811211363
Cites: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 May;42(4):487-9211383964
Cites: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001 Mar-Apr;10(2):85-9411499858
Cites: J Abnorm Psychol. 2002 May;111(2):279-8912003449
Cites: Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;181:416-2112411268
Cites: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997 Sep;54(9):857-649294377
Cites: Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1983 Jul;53(3):532-416349374
Cites: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1984 Mar;12(1):55-776715694
Cites: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984 Oct;52(5):739-496501659
Cites: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1990 Sep;29(5):710-82228923
Cites: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1991 Mar;30(2):233-402016227
Cites: J Child Neurol. 1993 Apr;8(2):157-638505479
Cites: Behav Modif. 1993 Jul;17(3):287-3138343100
Cites: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996 Apr;35(4):409-328919704
Cites: Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Jul-Sep;18(3):145-816923651
Cites: Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;20(4):386-9217551354
Cites: Biom J. 2008 Oct;50(5):667-7718932130
Cites: J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2003 Feb;24(1):51-712584485
Cites: JAMA. 1998 Apr 8;279(14):1100-79546570
Cites: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998 Mar;37(3):305-139519636
Cites: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997 Oct;65(5):749-579337494
Cites: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2003 Mar;32(1):153-6512611031
Cites: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;36(7):980-89204677
Cites: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;56(12):1073-8610591283
Cites: J Atten Disord. 2006 Aug;10(1):83-9116840596
Cites: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2005 Jun;33(3):349-6215957562
Cites: Drugs. 1998 Aug;56(2):215-239711446
Cites: Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Apr;155(4):493-89545994
Cites: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1977 Apr;18(2):137-65326801
PubMed ID
21255399 View in PubMed
Less detail

Third-wave cognitive therapy versus mentalisation-based treatment for major depressive disorder: a randomised clinical trial.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature266353
Source
BMJ Open. 2014;4(8):e004903
Publication Type
Article
Date
2014
Author
Janus Christian Jakobsen
Christian Gluud
Mickey Kongerslev
Kirsten Aaskov Larsen
Per Sørensen
Per Winkel
Theis Lange
Ulf Søgaard
Erik Simonsen
Source
BMJ Open. 2014;4(8):e004903
Date
2014
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Adult
Cognitive Therapy - methods
Denmark
Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology - therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Theory of Mind
Treatment Outcome
Abstract
To compare the benefits and harms of third-wave cognitive therapy versus mentalisation-based therapy in a small sample of depressed participants.
The trial was conducted at an outpatient psychiatric clinic for non-psychotic patients in Roskilde, Denmark.
44 consecutive adult participants diagnosed with major depressive disorder.
18 weeks of third-wave cognitive therapy (n=22) versus 18 weeks of mentalisation-based treatment (n=22).
The primary outcome was the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS) at end of treatment (18 weeks). Secondary outcomes were: remission (HDRS
Notes
Cites: Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Jan;6(1):71-711273440
Cites: Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;170(9):1041-5024030613
Cites: Psychopharmacol Bull. 1973 Jan;9(1):13-284682398
Cites: Br J Clin Psychol. 1984 May;23 ( Pt 2):93-96722384
Cites: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1986 Feb;54(1):54-93958302
Cites: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991 Sep;48(9):851-51929776
Cites: Stat Med. 1994 Jul 15-30;13(13-14):1341-52; discussion 1353-67973215
Cites: Int J Psychoanal. 1996 Jun;77 ( Pt 3):519-368818768
Cites: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56-6214399272
Cites: Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;161(12):2163-7715569884
Cites: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;63(7):757-6616818865
Cites: J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jan;61(1):64-7518083463
Cites: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Dec;75(6):1000-518085916
Cites: PLoS Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):e4518303940
Cites: J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;61(8):763-918411040
Cites: Behav Res Ther. 2009 May;47(5):366-7319249017
Cites: Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;166(12):1355-6419833787
Cites: JAMA. 2010 Mar 24;303(12):1180-720332404
Cites: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Apr;78(2):169-8320350028
Cites: Am J Psychiatry. 2010 May;167(5):487-820439392
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 1;152(11):726-3220335313
Cites: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(6):CD00650720556767
Cites: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:9020920306
Cites: Epilepsy Behav. 2010 Nov;19(3):247-5420851055
Cites: J Affect Disord. 2011 Apr;130(1-2):138-4421093925
Cites: PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e1904421556370
Cites: Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2011 Jun;79(6):330-921412690
Cites: PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e2289021829664
Cites: PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e2829922174786
Cites: J Affect Disord. 2012 Mar;137(1-3):4-1421501877
Cites: Psychol Med. 2012 Jul;42(7):1343-5722051174
Cites: BMJ. 2012;344:e386322705814
Cites: Psychiatry Res. 2013 Dec 15;210(2):672-423850430
Cites: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:3424588900
Cites: BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:23223253305
Cites: J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 Mar;201(3):202-723407204
Cites: Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Apr 14;165(16):1659-6212756823
PubMed ID
25138802 View in PubMed
Less detail

Pathways to care for first-episode psychosis in an early detection healthcare sector: part of the Scandinavian TIPS study.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature70615
Source
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2005 Aug;48:s24-8
Publication Type
Article
Date
Aug-2005
Author
Jan Olav Johannessen
Tor K Larsen
Inge Joa
Ingrid Melle
Svein Friis
Stein Opjordsmoen
Bjørn Rishovd Rund
Erik Simonsen
Per Vaglum
Thomas H McGlashan
Author Affiliation
Division of Psychiatry, General Hospital of Rogaland, Armauer Hanssens vei 20, 4000 Stavanger, Norway. jojo@sir.no
Source
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2005 Aug;48:s24-8
Date
Aug-2005
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Critical Pathways - organization & administration
Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration - standards
Early Diagnosis
Female
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Norway
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Patient Care Team - organization & administration
Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis - therapy
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early detection programmes aim to reduce the duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) by public education and by prompt access to treatment via active outreach detection teams. AIMS: To determine whether those with first-episode psychosis in an early detection healthcare area with existing referral channels differ from those who access care via detection teams. METHOD: Those with first-episode psychosis recruited via detection teams were compared with those accessing treatment via conventional channels, at baseline and after 3 months of acute treatment. RESULTS: Patients recruited via detection teams are younger males with a longer DUP, a less dramatic symptom picture and better functioning; however they recover more slowly, and have more symptoms at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: After establishing low threshold active case-seeking detection teams, we found clear differences between those patients entering treatment via detection teams v. those obtaining treatment via the usual channels. Such profiling may be informative for early detection service development.
PubMed ID
16055803 View in PubMed
Less detail

Treatment and violent behavior in persons with first episode psychosis during a 10-year prospective follow-up study.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature259887
Source
Schizophr Res. 2014 Jul;156(2-3):272-6
Publication Type
Article
Date
Jul-2014
Author
Johannes Langeveld
Stål Bjørkly
Bjørn Auestad
Helene Barder
Julie Evensen
Wenche Ten Velden Hegelstad
Inge Joa
Jan Olav Johannessen
Tor Ketil Larsen
Ingrid Melle
Stein Opjordsmoen
Jan Ivar Røssberg
Bjørn Rishovd Rund
Erik Simonsen
Per Vaglum
Thomas McGlashan
Svein Friis
Source
Schizophr Res. 2014 Jul;156(2-3):272-6
Date
Jul-2014
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Adult
Antipsychotic Agents - therapeutic use
Crime
Denmark - epidemiology
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Logistic Models
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Norway - epidemiology
Prevalence
Prospective Studies
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychotherapy
Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis - epidemiology - therapy
Risk
Substance-Related Disorders - epidemiology
Violence
Young Adult
Abstract
First episode psychosis (FEP) patients have an increased risk for violence and criminal activity prior to initial treatment. However, little is known about the prevalence of criminality and acts of violence many years after implementation of treatment for a first episode psychosis.
To assess the prevalence of criminal and violent behaviors during a 10-year follow-up period after the debut of a first psychosis episode, and to identify early predictors and concomitant risk factors of violent behavior.
A prospective design was used with comprehensive assessments of criminal behavior, drug abuse, clinical, social and treatment variables at baseline, five, and 10-year follow-up. Additionally, threatening and violent behavior was assessed at 10-year follow-up. A clinical epidemiological sample of first-episode psychosis patients (n=178) was studied.
During the 10-year follow-up period, 20% of subjects had been apprehended or incarcerated. At 10-year follow-up, 15% of subjects had exposed others to threats or violence during the year before assessment. Illegal drug use at baseline and five-year follow-up, and a longer duration of psychotic symptoms were found to be predictive of violent behavior during the year preceding the 10-year follow-up.
After treatment initiation, the overall prevalence of violence in psychotic patients drops gradually to rates close to those of the general population. However, persistent illicit drug abuse is a serious risk factor for violent behavior, even long after the start of treatment. Achieving remission early and reducing substance abuse may contribute to a lower long-term risk for violent behavior in FEP patients.
PubMed ID
24837683 View in PubMed
Less detail

Early Predictors of Ten-Year Course in First-Episode Psychosis.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature279449
Source
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Apr 01;67(4):438-43
Publication Type
Article
Date
Apr-01-2016
Author
Svein Friis
Ingrid Melle
Jan Olav Johannessen
Jan Ivar Røssberg
Helene Eidsmo Barder
Julie Horgen Evensen
Ulrik Haahr
Wenche Ten Velden Hegelstad
Inge Joa
Johannes Langeveld
Tor Ketil Larsen
Stein Opjordsmoen
Bjørn Rishovd Rund
Erik Simonsen
Per Wiggen Vaglum
Thomas H McGlashan
Source
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Apr 01;67(4):438-43
Date
Apr-01-2016
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Adult
Denmark - epidemiology
Disease Progression
Female
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Norway - epidemiology
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data
Prognosis
Psychotic Disorders - diagnosis - drug therapy - epidemiology
Remission Induction
Schizophrenia - diagnosis - drug therapy - epidemiology
Social Skills
Time Factors
Abstract
Identifying patients at risk of poor outcome at an early stage of illness can aid in treatment planning. This study sought to create a best-fit statistical model of known baseline and early-course risk factors to predict time in psychosis during a ten-year follow-up period after a first psychotic episode.
Between 1997 and 2000, 301 patients with DSM-IV nonorganic, nonaffective first-episode psychosis were recruited consecutively from catchment area-based sectors in Norway and Denmark. Specialized mental health personnel evaluated patients at baseline, three months, and one, two, five, and ten years (N=186 at ten years). Time in psychosis was defined as time with scores =4 on any of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale items P1, P3, P5, P6, and G9. Evaluations were retrospective, based on clinical interviews and all available clinical information. During the first two years, patients were also evaluated by their clinicians at least biweekly. Baseline and early-course predictors of long-term course were identified with linear mixed-model analyses.
Four variables provided significant, additive predictions of longer time in psychosis during the ten-year follow-up: deterioration in premorbid social functioning, duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) of =26 weeks, core schizophrenia spectrum disorder, and no remission within three months.
First-episode psychosis patients should be followed carefully after the start of treatment. If symptoms do not remit within three months with adequate treatment, there is a considerable risk of a poor long-term outcome, particularly for patients with a deterioration in premorbid social functioning, a DUP of at least half a year, and a diagnosis within the core schizophrenia spectrum.
PubMed ID
26567932 View in PubMed
Less detail