Skip header and navigation

Refine By

2 records – page 1 of 1.

Randomised social-skills training and parental training plus standard treatment versus standard treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder - the SOSTRA trial protocol.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature137704
Source
Trials. 2011;12:18
Publication Type
Article
Date
2011
Author
Ole Jakob Storebø
Jesper Pedersen
Maria Skoog
Per Hove Thomsen
Per Winkel
Christian Gluud
Erik Simonsen
Author Affiliation
Child Psychiatric Daytime Clinic, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Centre, Region Zealand, Holbaek, Denmark. ojst@regionsjaelland.dk
Source
Trials. 2011;12:18
Date
2011
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity - diagnosis - drug therapy - psychology - therapy
Child
Child Behavior
Cognition
Combined Modality Therapy
Denmark
Emotions
Female
Humans
Male
Parents - psychology
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Questionnaires
Research Design
Sample Size
Social Behavior
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Abstract
Children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are hyperactive and impulsive, cannot maintain attention, and have difficulties with social interactions. Medical treatment may alleviate symptoms of ADHD, but seldom solves difficulties with social interactions. Social-skills training may benefit ADHD children in their social interactions. We want to examine the effects of social-skills training on difficulties related to the children's ADHD symptoms and social interactions.
The design is randomised two-armed, parallel group, assessor-blinded trial. Children aged 8-12 years with a diagnosis of ADHD are randomised to social-skills training and parental training plus standard treatment versus standard treatment alone. A sample size calculation estimated that at least 52 children must be included to show a 4-point difference in the primary outcome on the Conners 3rd Edition subscale for 'hyperactivity-impulsivity' between the intervention group and the control group. The outcomes will be assessed 3 and 6 months after randomisation. The primary outcome measure is ADHD symptoms. The secondary outcome is social skills. Tertiary outcomes include the relationship between social skills and symptoms of ADHD, the ability to form attachment, and parents' ADHD symptoms.
We hope that the results from this trial will show that the social-skills training together with medication may have a greater general effect on ADHD symptoms and social and emotional competencies than medication alone.
ClinicalTrials (NCT): NCT00937469.
Notes
Cites: Can J Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;44(10):1007-1610637680
Cites: Am J Psychiatry. 2000 May;157(5):816-810784477
Cites: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;40(2):147-5811211363
Cites: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 May;42(4):487-9211383964
Cites: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001 Mar-Apr;10(2):85-9411499858
Cites: J Abnorm Psychol. 2002 May;111(2):279-8912003449
Cites: Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;181:416-2112411268
Cites: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997 Sep;54(9):857-649294377
Cites: Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1983 Jul;53(3):532-416349374
Cites: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1984 Mar;12(1):55-776715694
Cites: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984 Oct;52(5):739-496501659
Cites: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1990 Sep;29(5):710-82228923
Cites: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1991 Mar;30(2):233-402016227
Cites: J Child Neurol. 1993 Apr;8(2):157-638505479
Cites: Behav Modif. 1993 Jul;17(3):287-3138343100
Cites: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1996 Apr;35(4):409-328919704
Cites: Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Jul-Sep;18(3):145-816923651
Cites: Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;20(4):386-9217551354
Cites: Biom J. 2008 Oct;50(5):667-7718932130
Cites: J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2003 Feb;24(1):51-712584485
Cites: JAMA. 1998 Apr 8;279(14):1100-79546570
Cites: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998 Mar;37(3):305-139519636
Cites: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997 Oct;65(5):749-579337494
Cites: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2003 Mar;32(1):153-6512611031
Cites: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;36(7):980-89204677
Cites: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;56(12):1073-8610591283
Cites: J Atten Disord. 2006 Aug;10(1):83-9116840596
Cites: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2005 Jun;33(3):349-6215957562
Cites: Drugs. 1998 Aug;56(2):215-239711446
Cites: Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Apr;155(4):493-89545994
Cites: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1977 Apr;18(2):137-65326801
PubMed ID
21255399 View in PubMed
Less detail

Third-wave cognitive therapy versus mentalisation-based treatment for major depressive disorder: a randomised clinical trial.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature266353
Source
BMJ Open. 2014;4(8):e004903
Publication Type
Article
Date
2014
Author
Janus Christian Jakobsen
Christian Gluud
Mickey Kongerslev
Kirsten Aaskov Larsen
Per Sørensen
Per Winkel
Theis Lange
Ulf Søgaard
Erik Simonsen
Source
BMJ Open. 2014;4(8):e004903
Date
2014
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Adult
Cognitive Therapy - methods
Denmark
Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology - therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Theory of Mind
Treatment Outcome
Abstract
To compare the benefits and harms of third-wave cognitive therapy versus mentalisation-based therapy in a small sample of depressed participants.
The trial was conducted at an outpatient psychiatric clinic for non-psychotic patients in Roskilde, Denmark.
44 consecutive adult participants diagnosed with major depressive disorder.
18 weeks of third-wave cognitive therapy (n=22) versus 18 weeks of mentalisation-based treatment (n=22).
The primary outcome was the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS) at end of treatment (18 weeks). Secondary outcomes were: remission (HDRS
Notes
Cites: Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Jan;6(1):71-711273440
Cites: Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;170(9):1041-5024030613
Cites: Psychopharmacol Bull. 1973 Jan;9(1):13-284682398
Cites: Br J Clin Psychol. 1984 May;23 ( Pt 2):93-96722384
Cites: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1986 Feb;54(1):54-93958302
Cites: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991 Sep;48(9):851-51929776
Cites: Stat Med. 1994 Jul 15-30;13(13-14):1341-52; discussion 1353-67973215
Cites: Int J Psychoanal. 1996 Jun;77 ( Pt 3):519-368818768
Cites: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56-6214399272
Cites: Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;161(12):2163-7715569884
Cites: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;63(7):757-6616818865
Cites: J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jan;61(1):64-7518083463
Cites: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Dec;75(6):1000-518085916
Cites: PLoS Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):e4518303940
Cites: J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;61(8):763-918411040
Cites: Behav Res Ther. 2009 May;47(5):366-7319249017
Cites: Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;166(12):1355-6419833787
Cites: JAMA. 2010 Mar 24;303(12):1180-720332404
Cites: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Apr;78(2):169-8320350028
Cites: Am J Psychiatry. 2010 May;167(5):487-820439392
Cites: Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 1;152(11):726-3220335313
Cites: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(6):CD00650720556767
Cites: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:9020920306
Cites: Epilepsy Behav. 2010 Nov;19(3):247-5420851055
Cites: J Affect Disord. 2011 Apr;130(1-2):138-4421093925
Cites: PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e1904421556370
Cites: Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2011 Jun;79(6):330-921412690
Cites: PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e2289021829664
Cites: PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e2829922174786
Cites: J Affect Disord. 2012 Mar;137(1-3):4-1421501877
Cites: Psychol Med. 2012 Jul;42(7):1343-5722051174
Cites: BMJ. 2012;344:e386322705814
Cites: Psychiatry Res. 2013 Dec 15;210(2):672-423850430
Cites: BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:3424588900
Cites: BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:23223253305
Cites: J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 Mar;201(3):202-723407204
Cites: Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Apr 14;165(16):1659-6212756823
PubMed ID
25138802 View in PubMed
Less detail