Skip header and navigation

2 records – page 1 of 1.

[Stress and burnout increase among general practitioners in Denmark].

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature274758
Source
Ugeskr Laeger. 2014 Jan 20;176(2):135-8
Publication Type
Article
Date
Jan-20-2014
Author
Anette Fischer Pedersen
Christina Maar Andersen
Frede Olesen
Peter Vedsted
Source
Ugeskr Laeger. 2014 Jan 20;176(2):135-8
Date
Jan-20-2014
Language
Danish
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Burnout, Professional - epidemiology - etiology - psychology - therapy
Denmark - epidemiology
General Practitioners - psychology
Humans
Stress, Psychological - epidemiology - etiology - psychology - therapy
Abstract
Burnout is characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and reduced personal accomplishment. In agreement with international studies, Danish figures have revealed an increase in prevalence of severe burnout from 2.8% in 2004 to 5.3% in 2012. There is only little research on the consequences for the burned-out general practitioner (GP) and his patients as well as on appropriate intervention strategies. Even though burnout appears to be caused by a combination of personality factors and environmental conditions, the literature has one-sidedly focused on the resilience of the individual GP.
Notes
Comment In: Ugeskr Laeger. 2014 Jan 20;176(2):13024629676
PubMed ID
24629678 View in PubMed
Less detail

Data quality and factor analysis of the Danish version of the Relationship Scale Questionnaire.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature285664
Source
PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0176810
Publication Type
Article
Date
2017
Author
Christina Maar Andersen
Anette Fischer Pedersen
Anders Helles Carlsen
Frede Olesen
Peter Vedsted
Source
PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0176810
Date
2017
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Adult
Denmark
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Surveys and Questionnaires
Abstract
The Relationship Scale Questionnaire (RSQ) is a widely-used measure of adult attachment, but whether the results obtained by the RSQ fit the attachment construct has only been examined to a limited extent.
The objectives of this study were to investigate the psychometric properties of the Danish translation of the RSQ and to test whether the results are consistent with the hypothesized model of attachment.
The study included two samples: 602 general practitioners and 611 cancer patients. The two samples were analyzed separately. Data quality was assessed by mean, median and missing values for each item, floor and ceiling effects, average inter-item correlations and Cronbach's a for each subscale. Test-retest was assessed by intra-class correlations among 76 general practitioners. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to establish evidence of the four proposed subscales. Due to an inadequate fit of the model, data was randomly split into two equally sized subsamples and an exploratory factor analysis was conducted for all 30 items in the first subsample comprised of 286 cancer patients and 285 general practitioners. The EFA yielded a three-factor structure which was validated through a confirmatory factor analyses in a second subsample comprised of 278 cancer patients and 289 general practitioners.
The data quality of the RSQ was generally good, except low internal consistency and low to moderate test-retest reliability. The four subscales of the RSQ were not confirmed by the confirmatory factor analysis. An exploratory factor analysis suggested a three-factor solution for both general practitioners and patients, which accounted for 61.1% of the variance among general practitioners and 62.5% among patients. The new three-factor solution was verified in a confirmatory factor analyses.
The proposed four-factor model of the RSQ could not be confirmed in this study. Similar challenges have been found by other studies validating the RSQ. An alternative three-factor structure was found for the RSQ.
Notes
Cites: J Psychosom Res. 2002 Sep;53(3):763-7312217450
Cites: Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2013 Jan 10;8:123302491
Cites: Addict Behav. 2004 Nov;29(8):1633-615451130
Cites: Acta Orthop. 2010 Dec;81(6):703-721110703
Cites: Scand J Psychol. 2003 Apr;44(2):141-5112778982
Cites: Psychooncology. 2009 Oct;18(10):1045-5219195009
Cites: Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Jan;158(1):29-3511136630
Cites: Pain. 2009 Jun;143(3):200-519345016
Cites: Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jul;63(2):552-6216480807
Cites: J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-4217161752
Cites: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Aug;61(2):226-441920064
Cites: Psychol Psychother. 2009 Sep;82(Pt 3):267-7719288978
Cites: J Psychosom Res. 2010 Oct;69(4):419-3220846544
Cites: Neuroscience. 2012 Sep 18;220:149-5722732507
Cites: Psychosom Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;63(4):556-6711485109
Cites: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Aug;31(8):1026-3816000265
Cites: Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):539-4420007946
Cites: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Apr;58(4):644-6314570079
Cites: Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2009;69(2):119-3219960862
Cites: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Mar;52(3):511-243572722
Cites: Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Mar;28(3):407-2917719157
Cites: Psychosom Med. 2002 Jul-Aug;64(4):660-712140356
Cites: Subst Use Misuse. 2009;44(1):99-11419137485
Cites: Scand J Psychol. 2011 Jun;52(3):268-7621244436
Cites: Int J Family Med. 2013;2013:60371324383000
Cites: Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Nov;30(11):3553-6219347874
Cites: Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2011;2:null22893825
Cites: Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(7 Suppl):30-321775347
Cites: Aust Occup Ther J. 2008 Dec;55(4):29720887486
Cites: Psicothema. 2013;25(2):275-8123628545
Cites: Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008 Mar-Apr;30(2):104-1118291292
PubMed ID
28472074 View in PubMed
Less detail