Skip header and navigation

2 records – page 1 of 1.

Growing a professional network to over 3000 members in less than 4 years: evaluation of InspireNet, British Columbia's virtual nursing health services research network.

https://arctichealth.org/en/permalink/ahliterature257190
Source
J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(2):e49
Publication Type
Article
Date
2014
Author
Noreen Frisch
Pat Atherton
Elizabeth Borycki
Grace Mickelson
Jennifer Cordeiro
Helen Novak Lauscher
Agnes Black
Author Affiliation
School of Nursing, Faculty of Human and Social Development, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada. nfrisch@uvic.ca.
Source
J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(2):e49
Date
2014
Language
English
Publication Type
Article
Keywords
Blogging
British Columbia
Communication
Computer Communication Networks
Focus Groups
Health Services Research - organization & administration - utilization
Humans
Internet
Nurses - organization & administration
Nursing Research - organization & administration
Social Media
User-Computer Interface
Abstract
Use of Web 2.0 and social media technologies has become a new area of research among health professionals. Much of this work has focused on the use of technologies for health self-management and the ways technologies support communication between care providers and consumers. This paper addresses a new use of technology in providing a platform for health professionals to support professional development, increase knowledge utilization, and promote formal/informal professional communication. Specifically, we report on factors necessary to attract and sustain health professionals' use of a network designed to increase nurses' interest in and use of health services research and to support knowledge utilization activities in British Columbia, Canada.
"InspireNet", a virtual professional network for health professionals, is a living laboratory permitting documentation of when and how professionals take up Web 2.0 and social media. Ongoing evaluation documents our experiences in establishing, operating, and evaluating this network.
Overall evaluation methods included (1) tracking website use, (2) conducting two member surveys, and (3) soliciting member feedback through focus groups and interviews with those who participated in electronic communities of practice (eCoPs) and other stakeholders. These data have been used to learn about the types of support that seem relevant to network growth.
Network growth exceeded all expectations. Members engaged with varying aspects of the network's virtual technologies, such as teams of professionals sharing a common interest, research teams conducting their work, and instructional webinars open to network members. Members used wikis, blogs, and discussion groups to support professional work, as well as a members' database with contact information and areas of interest. The database is accessed approximately 10 times per day. InspireNet public blog posts are accessed roughly 500 times each. At the time of writing, 21 research teams conduct their work virtually using the InspireNet platform; 10 topic-based Action Teams meet to address issues of mutual concern. Nursing and other health professionals, even those who rated themselves as computer literate, required significant mentoring and support in their efforts to adopt their practice to a virtual environment. There was a steep learning curve for professionals to learn to work in a virtual environment and to benefit from the available technologies.
Virtual professional networks can be positioned to make a significant contribution to ongoing professional practice and to creating environments supportive of information sharing, mentoring, and learning across geographical boundaries. Nonetheless, creation of a Web 2.0 and social media platform is not sufficient, in and of itself, to attract or sustain a vibrant community of professionals interested in improving their practice. Essential support includes instruction in the use of Web-based activities and time management, a biweekly e-Newsletter, regular communication from leaders, and an annual face-to-face conference.
Notes
Cites: J Contin Educ Nurs. 2010 May;41(5):199-20020481418
Cites: Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep;56(3):495-50823835911
Cites: J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(6):e11923759312
Cites: Br J Community Nurs. 2013 Apr;18(4):180-523574909
Cites: J Fam Nurs. 2010 Aug;16(3):251-520686101
Cites: J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2010 Spring;30(2):139-4320564704
Cites: Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Sep;92(3):426-3123899831
Cites: Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):179-205, III-IV11439464
PubMed ID
24566806 View in PubMed
Less detail